Court of Appeal of Zambia - 2018 May

6 judgments
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 6 judgments found.

6 judgments
May 2018
A written exculpatory statement can constitute a disciplinary hearing; summary dismissal was not wrongful under the disciplinary code.
  • Employment law — Disciplinary proceedings — "Hearing" includes written exculpatory submissions — Opportunity to be heard either orally or in writing — Summary dismissal permissible for specified offences under Disciplinary Code (Clause 4.7.1(a)) — Reliance on Sitali v Central Board of Health and Mumba v Telecel.
24 May 2018
A written exculpatory response constitutes a disciplinary 'hearing'; summary dismissal was lawful, so wrongful-dismissal award set aside.
  • Disciplinary proceedings — Meaning of 'hearing' — written exculpatory statement suffices; summary dismissal — Clause 4.7.1(a); procedural fairness — Clause 2.6; reliance on Sitali v Central Board of Health and Mumba v Telecel.
24 May 2018
Appeal partly allowed: K366,769,847 awarded based on delivery notes; foreign-currency claim dismissed for lack of locus and proof.
  • Evidence — proof of delivery — delivery notes and referee's report as evidential matching of invoices; Appeal — interference with trial findings only for perversity or misapprehension; Cross-examination — limits of hypothetical questions as evidential admissions; Credibility — caution against one-sided demeanour findings; Agency — agent's locus standi to sue on principal's contract; Interest and costs.
24 May 2018
Challenges to a Commissioner’s re-entry must be appealed to the Lands Tribunal under Section 13(3); High Court lacked jurisdiction.
  • Lands Act s.13(3) — Challenge to Commissioner's re-entry — Appeal to Lands Tribunal for rectification — Lands Tribunal power limited to rectification/recommendation; cancellation of title reserved to High Court via prescribed procedure — Jurisdictional effect of procedural non-compliance.
16 May 2018
Appeal allowed where dying statement failed to identify the appellants and alibi and circumstantial evidence were insufficient.
  • Criminal law — murder; dying declarations/res gestae and identification; relatives as suspect witnesses; alibi — prosecution duty to disprove; circumstantial evidence must exclude reasonable doubt; joint liability (s.22 Penal Code).
15 May 2018
Arbitral award upheld: arbitrator acted within jurisdiction and liquidated damages clause did not offend public policy.
  • Arbitration — setting aside award — scope of arbitrator's jurisdiction — court may consult award, pleadings and affidavits where submission not exhibited — implied contractual terms — liquidated damages vs penalty — public policy (gross injustice) threshold.
2 May 2018