|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| October 2024 |
|
|
Court allowed the applicant's appeal because the High Court determined sua sponte legal issues without hearing the parties.
Constitutional reference (Art.128(2)) — sua sponte determination — inherent jurisdiction vs Order 14A — audi alteram partem — locus standi — petition formalities.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
The applicant's dilatory conduct and failure to show sufficient cause justified refusal to set aside judgment obtained in his absence.
Civil procedure – setting aside judgment obtained in absence – Order 35 rules 4 & 5 – "sufficient cause" – proof of service – case management and unless orders – finality of litigation – litigant dilatoriness.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
A garnishee order binds subsequent deposits into the same account: accruing credits may satisfy the outstanding judgment debt.
Garnishee proceedings — third‑party debt order — Order 49 Rule 1 (White Book) — "debt due or accruing" — attachment of subsequent credits to the same account — Heppenstall distinguished — chose in action frozen for enforcement of judgment debt.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
Deposit of title deeds created an equitable mortgage; assigned receivables were not the sole security—appeal dismissed.
Revolving invoice discounting facility — receivables as pledged source of repayment but not sole security — surrender/deposit of title deeds creates third‑party equitable mortgage — equity of redemption preserved — frustration not established.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
Specific performance and rescission are mutually exclusive; inconsistent remedies must be pleaded alternatively and the record remitted for rehearing.
Specific performance; rescission of contract; inconsistent remedies must be pleaded in the alternative (Order XVIII Rule 15); trial court's election of remedy; defective pleadings; remission for fresh hearing.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
Appeal dismissed for non‑compliance with record‑of‑appeal rules where appellant delayed seeking amendment.
Appeal procedure — defective record of appeal — non‑compliance with Order 10 Rule 9(5)(c) and 9(7) — jurisdictional preliminary objection — discretion to allow amendment — delay fatal to relief.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
Appellant must refund ZMW 1,220,843 taken to pay ZRA; fraud claims dismissed; costs awarded to the respondent.
Commercial law – recovery of funds paid for release of impounded goods – payment intended for tax to revenue authority versus consultancy fee – misappropriation/repayment – proof required for fraudulent misrepresentation – costs follow the event; appellate restraint on interfering with trial judge's discretion.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
The appellant’s diary error was not a sufficient excuse; the application to set aside was time‑barred and appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure — Setting aside judgment obtained in absence of a party — Order XXXV High Court Rules and Order XXXV Rules of the Supreme Court — seven‑day time limit for application to set aside — adequacy of explanation for non‑attendance — discretion to reopen trial — costs as alternative remedy.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
Whether a tribunal abused its discretion in ordering subpoenas absent detailed findings of disputed facts.
Procedure — Capital Markets Tribunal — Power to subpoena witnesses and compel documents — Applicant must show contested factual issues and good reasons — Appellate review by abuse-of-discretion standard — Extempore rulings need not recite full argument if reason for decision is discernable.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
The appellant's contingency-fee agreement contingent on litigation recovery was illegal and unenforceable under Rule 8.
Legal practitioners — Contingency fees — Definition and prohibition under Rule 8 of the Legal Practitioners Practice Rules — Debt-collection agreements contingent on recovery unenforceable when recovery achieved through litigation — Distinction between contentious and non-contentious business — Conveyancing and Non-Contentious Matters (Costs) Order exception requires express post-litigation agreement.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Part performance and documentary memoranda can satisfy the Statute of Frauds for a land sale; vendor cannot unilaterally revise price.
Property law – Sale of land – Statute of Frauds (Section 4) – sufficiency of memorandum and part performance; change of relationship from landlord/tenant to vendor/purchaser; vendor’s attempted unilateral price increase and demand for rent; time not of the essence in open-ended sale agreements.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Return or replacement of the sold decanter was a condition precedent to payment; appeal dismissed.
Contract/sale of shares – subject-matter (decanter) as integral asset – condition precedent to payment – interpretation of court judgments – inherent jurisdiction to clarify orders – writ of fieri facias and stay of execution.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Court of Appeal set aside dismissal for want of prosecution and remitted case for trial, finding adjournment justified.
Civil procedure — dismissal for want of prosecution — adjournment — inherent jurisdiction — inordinate delay vs. excusable absence — appellate interference with trial court's discretion — matter restored and remitted for trial.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Appellant lacked standing to challenge sale under separate charging-order proceedings; appellate court affirmed trial findings and dismissed appeal.
Civil procedure – charging orders and orders for sale – locus to challenge orders granted in separate proceedings – appellate deference to trial findings; property law – bona fide purchaser for value without notice; administrative/contractual claims – entitlement of sitting tenant to purchase; execution by charging order – procedural requirements and effect.
|
29 October 2024 |
|
Appeal allowed: Registrar miscalculated damages; correct judgment debt ZMW 790,023.24 with post-judgment interest at 9.5%.
Civil appeal — assessment of damages — misapprehension of facts by Registrar — correct measure of loss is actual outlay less payments received — interest at average short-term deposit rate for assessment period; post-judgment interest at 9.5% per annum.
|
23 October 2024 |
|
The appellant's challenges to identification and circumstantial evidence failed; conviction and death sentence upheld.
Criminal law – identification evidence – reliability of relative witness; corroboration not always required if danger of false implication excluded. Criminal law – circumstantial evidence – odd coincidences can produce only one reasonable inference of guilt. Criminal procedure – evaluation of alibi and investigative omissions in safety of conviction.
|
17 October 2024 |
|
Relative's credible identification plus compelling circumstantial evidence upheld the murder conviction and death sentence.
Criminal law – Murder; Identification by relative witness – admissibility and need for corroboration; Circumstantial evidence – odd coincidences and last-seen principle; Safety of conviction; Appeal dismissed.
|
17 October 2024 |
|
Appellant's murder conviction upheld: relative's identification and circumstantial 'odd coincidences' established guilt as the only reasonable inference.
Criminal law — Identification by close relative — Corroboration of witness with alleged interest — Circumstantial evidence — 'last seen' and 'odd coincidences' doctrine.
|
17 October 2024 |
|
The appellant's appeal dismissed; conviction and death sentence upheld on reliable single identifying witness evidence.
Criminal law – murder; single identifying witness; identification at night; danger of mistaken identity; alibi evidence; appellate review of credibility.
|
17 October 2024 |
|
A caveat requires proof of an enforceable legal or equitable interest; absent such proof, it must be removed and statutory liquidation remedies followed.
Lands and Deeds Registry Act s76—caveatable interest; requirement of legal/equitable interest; absence of mortgage/assignment; promissory estoppel inapplicable; liquidation—statutory remedies under Banking and Financial Services Act.
|
10 October 2024 |
|
Respondent failed to prove the identity of plots; cancellation of the appellant's certificate of title was set aside.
Land law – identity of land – proof of identity of parcel (Plot FS-3/F53 v Stand No. 10959) – burden of proof on claimant; Certificate of title – cancellation only on proven fraud or impropriety and proper evidence; Pleadings – relief must be supported by pleaded case; Appellate interference with trial findings of fact.
|
10 October 2024 |
|
Hearing an appeal without proof of service breached natural justice; appeal allowed and matter remitted to the High Court.
Civil procedure – Service of process – High Court Rules Order 10 Rule 3 – requirement for acknowledgment or affidavit of service where default may lead to final judgment – right to be heard/natural justice – hearing in absence without proof of service vitiates decision – matter remitted for rehearing.
|
9 October 2024 |
|
Leave granted because non‑conviction forfeiture issues raise points of law of public importance.
Non‑conviction asset forfeiture — admissibility of evidence from criminal investigations in civil forfeiture — burden of proof under s33 FPOCA — individual culpability — leave to appeal under s13.
|
7 October 2024 |
|
Whether a High Court tort claim is an abuse of process when a related labour claim is pending before the Industrial Relations Court.
Civil procedure — multiplicity of actions and abuse of process; distinguishing labour (constructive dismissal) and tort claims; jurisdiction of Industrial Relations Court; access to justice (Article 118) — striking out as extinguishing remedy; remittal for trial.
|
7 October 2024 |
|
A Certificate of Title may be cancelled if procured in breach of prescribed allocation procedures; unsigned offer letters and unproved revocation allegations fail.
Land law – Circular No. 1 of 1985 – procedure for allocations and council recommendations; Certificate of Title – conclusive evidence but subject to cancellation for fraud or procedural impropriety; validity/authentication of offer letters; judicial notice and burden of proof; appellate interference with trial factual findings.
|
3 October 2024 |
|
Court upheld cancellation of a title obtained without following statutory allocation procedures; unsigned offer letter unauthenticated.
Lands — Certificate of Title — Cancellation for procedural impropriety — Circular No. 1 of 1985 — Offer letters and authentication — Judicial notice of administrative revocation — Proof of payment and employee concessions.
|
3 October 2024 |
|
Damages for pain and anguish require specific pleading and proof; employer must remit payroll loan deductions or repay employees.
Employment law – redundancy – payroll loan deductions – employer's obligation to remit deductions or repay employees; damages for pain and anguish – must be specifically pleaded and proved; appellate review – abandoned grounds deemed abandoned for lack of argument.
|
3 October 2024 |
|
Allegations of forgery require clear pleading and higher proof; respondent proved contract and entitlement to specific performance.
Contract law – specific performance – remedy available where respondent proved contract and payments.
|
2 October 2024 |
|
Employer must remit or return payroll-deducted loan monies; damages for mental anguish require specific pleading and proof.
Employment law – redundancy – payroll deductions for loan repayments – employer's withholding and non-remittance; Civil procedure – pleading and proof – damages for pain and anguish must be specifically pleaded and proven; Remedies – restitution to employees where third-party creditor is not party to proceedings.
|
2 October 2024 |
|
High Court judgment set aside for failing to state adequate reasons; matter remitted for rehearing before a different judge.
Judgment-writing standards — requirement to state concise facts, issues, findings and reasons; Failure to reveal court’s reasoning — judgment set aside; Remittal for re‑hearing before different judge; Ambiguity in orders and unenforceable decisions; Costs to abide outcome of rehearing.
|
2 October 2024 |
|
Appellant failed to prove entitlement to additional responsibility allowance; appeal dismissed and costs awarded to respondent.
Employment law – Additional responsibility allowance – Requirement of written communication to prove formal appointment to additional duties; proof of entitlement; calculation of terminal benefits; appellate review of factual findings; costs follow the event.
|
2 October 2024 |
|
Court raised jurisdiction sua sponte and set aside lower court judgment because Local Court lacked authority to appoint the administrator.
Civil procedure – jurisdiction – court may raise jurisdiction suo motu – Intestate Succession Act s.43 limits Local Court jurisdiction to estates ≤ K50 – appointment of administrator by Local Court exceeding limit is void – transactions by an unauthorized administrator invalid – judgments without jurisdiction are null and void.
|
2 October 2024 |