Court of Appeal of Zambia - 2025 March

5 judgments
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 5 judgments found.

5 judgments
March 2025
Court upheld entitlement to unpaid allowances despite board non-determination; appellate court refused to disturb factual findings.
  • Employment law — allowances — interpretation of 'shall' and 'as determined by the Board' — accrued contractual benefits — facilitative imprest versus remunerative allowance — alleged transcription error in conditions of service — contra proferentum — appellate interference with factual findings — s.85A(d) ILRA discretionary awards.
31 March 2025
A purposive reading of Order 10 Rule 9(2) permits combined law-and-fact grounds if clearly stated; preliminary objection dismissed.
  • Civil procedure — Appeals — Order 10 Rule 9(2) CAR — Grounds of appeal must be concise and specify points of law or fact — Purposive interpretation permits combined law-and-fact grounds where clear — Preliminary objection dismissed where grounds disclose issues and contain no argument or narrative; ex parte leave not set aside confers jurisdiction.
27 March 2025
Failure to exhaust internal disciplinary appeals does not automatically bar a court claim; non-exhaustion affects credibility, not jurisdiction.
  • Industrial & Labour Relations Act s85(3) — jurisdiction — exhaustion of internal administrative/grievance channels — failure to exhaust does not automatically extinguish cause of action; internal appeal optional where policy uses "should"; non-exhaustion affects credibility/merits, not jurisdiction.
26 March 2025
Applicant must prove tainted property on a balance of probabilities; suspicion of foreign wrongdoing is insufficient.
  • Forfeiture — civil (non‑conviction) forfeiture — burden of proof on public prosecutor — 'tainted property' must be proved on balance of probabilities — mere reasonable suspicion or unparticularised foreign investigations insufficient — Section 29, 30(b), 31 and 34 Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime Act.
24 March 2025
Court granted extension to file record and heads, holding late filing affected discretion not jurisdiction.
  • Civil procedure — Extension of time — Order 13 Rule 3 CARs — Jurisdiction vs discretion — Late application within 21-day cushion — Transcript delay as justifiable cause — No inordinate delay (Birkett v James).
11 March 2025