Skip to document content Skip to main menu Skip to search

High Court of Zambia - 2018 May

17 judgments

Advanced search

Browse by year

Browse by month

Filter documents by title

Sort documents by

17 judgments


May 2018
Ernest Mwape v Mwape (HP/D 131 of 2016) [2018] ZMHC 404 (18 May 2018)	18 May 2018
Chisuwo Murru v Hachandi (HP 71 of 2018) [2018] ZMHC 498 (10 May 2018)	10 May 2018
Development Bank of Zambia v Ald Plant and Fleet Management Limited (HPC 545 of 2016) [2018] ZMHC 401 (10 May 2018)	10 May 2018
Ireen Kabwe and Others v The Bank of Zambia and Another (HP 707 of 2004) [2018] ZMHC 318 (10 May 2018)	10 May 2018
Jacques Baraka v The Chief Immigration Officer and Another (HP 1948 of 2017) [2018] ZMHC 436 (10 May 2018)	10 May 2018
Martin Bwalya v Luguru and Another (HP 579 of 2010) [2018] ZMHC 325 (10 May 2018)	10 May 2018
Nankhonde Kasonde and Others v Kashimbaya (HPC 39 of 2014) [2018] ZMHC 349 (10 May 2018)	10 May 2018
Sam Mwapela v The National Youth Development Council and Another (HP 779 of 2018) [2018] ZMHC 512 (10 May 2018)	10 May 2018
Emmanuel Kabwe v Manda (HP 192 of 2013) [2018] ZMHC 334 (8 May 2018)	8 May 2018
Samson Phiri v Goodman Crush Block Making Limited (HP 2256 of 2016) [2018] ZMHC 379 (8 May 2018)	8 May 2018
Isaac Musadabwe v The People (HPBA 7 of 2016) [2018] ZMHC 538 (7 May 2018)	7 May 2018
Masauso Lungu v Stanbic Bank Zambia Limited (HP 192 of 2013) [2018] ZMHC 333 (7 May 2018)	7 May 2018
Pulse Financial Services Limited v Phiri and Another (HP 1098 of 2017) [2018] ZMHC 427 (7 May 2018)	7 May 2018
Brenda Tembo Mukalula v The People (HPA/13/2018) [2018] ZMHC 567 (3 May 2018) Conviction for assault on a child quashed due to inadequate corroboration and insufficient medical and testimonial evidence. Criminal law — Evidence of children — Corroboration required where child gives sworn evidence for prosecution — Juveniles Amendment Act No. 3 of 2011 — Bernard Chisha v The People remains applicable — Medical evidence — Expert report must be detailed to link injuries to specific instrument; absence of such detail weakens causal inference Criminal procedure — Prosecution duty to call key witnesses — Failure to call spouse who intervened may attract rebuttable presumption in favour of accused	3 May 2018
Emelio Chilekwa and Others v Lusaka City Council and Others (HP 566 of 2011) [2018] ZMHC 511 (3 May 2018)	3 May 2018
Competition and Consumer Protection Commission v Chama (HP/CA 527 of 2015) [2018] ZMHC 365 (2 May 2018)	2 May 2018
Competition and Consumer Protection Commission v Rachel Mhone Chama (2015/HPC/A0527) [2018] ZMHC 563 (2 May 2018) Whether the respondent was a consumer of transport services and whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction absent an appealable Commission decision. Competition and Consumer Protection Act — interpretation of "consumer" (s.2(1)(b)) — distinguishing consumer of goods and consumer of services; meaning of "order" and "direction" under s.60; appealable decisions; jurisdiction of Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal; ultra vires acts and nullity of decisions.	2 May 2018