Principal Registry Lusaka - 2025 June

6 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
6 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
June 2025
24 June 2025
The applicant's resignation did not amount to constructive dismissal; disciplinary action did not fundamentally breach the employment contract.
Employment law – Constructive dismissal – three‑part test (resignation, fundamental breach, prompt action) – disciplinary process – unauthorised absence vs refusal to obey lawful instructions – internal remedies and PIP regularisation – high threshold for constructive dismissal.
23 June 2025
Non-compliance with Companies Act procedures rendered the director removal and share forfeiture void; plaintiff restored and entitled to account.
Companies Act s98 — removal of directors — mandatory notice and procedural safeguards; Calls on shares and forfeiture — requirement for board/shareholder resolution under articles and s148; Right of director/shareholder to inspect company records and to dividends (s159); Allegations of fraud require higher standard of proof; Loan largely settled — entitlement to reserved plot.
19 June 2025
Termination unlawful where respondent failed to specify or substantiate valid reasons connected to conduct or operational requirements.
Employment law – termination – Section 36(3) Employment Act – employer must give and prove valid reason connected to capacity, conduct or bona fide operational requirements – employer bears evidential burden – disciplinary procedure where misconduct alleged – damages for wrongful termination.
19 June 2025
Requirement to seek DEC permission and confiscation of passport unlawfully restricted the applicant's freedom of movement; presentation to court ordered.
Constitutional law — freedom of movement and passport seizure — police bond conditions; right to fair hearing within a reasonable time (Article 18(1)); limits on administrative restrictions pending criminal investigations.
17 June 2025
Circumstantial evidence and investigative failures meant murder was not proved beyond reasonable doubt; accused acquitted.
Criminal law — Murder — Circumstantial evidence and burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt — Res gestae admissible but not determinative — Investigative duty to conduct forensic examination (fingerprints on weapon) — Failure to investigate possible third‑party intruder operates in favour of accused — Where multiple inferences possible, adopt inference favourable to accused.
16 June 2025