Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
High Court of Northern Rhodesia
High Court of Northern Rhodesia - 1963
3 judgments
Advanced search
Years
Skip past years
All years
1964
1963
1949
1942
1941
1940
1939
1938
1937
1936
1935
1934
1933
1932
1931
Browse by year
All years
1964
1963
1949
1942
1941
1940
1939
1938
1937
1936
1935
1934
1933
1932
1931
Months
Skip past months
All months
March
April
June
Browse by month
All months
March
April
June
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Blagden J
Whelan J
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
June 1963
Pola Szeftel v Gutel Szeftel ((1963 - 1964) Z and NRLR 9) [1963] ZMHCNR 2 (6 June 1963)
A taxing officer may exceed ordinary costs scale under Order XXXIV, rule 7; it differs from the court’s higher-scale discretion.
Costs — Taxing officer’s discretion under Order XXXIV, r.7 to exceed scale based on skill, labour and responsibility — Distinct from court’s power under Order I, r.6A requiring special grounds — Review of taxation refused.
6 June 1963
April 1963
Laurent v Williams ((1963 - 1964) Z and NRLR 4) [1963] ZMHCNR 1 (27 April 1963)
Arrest without warrant was lawful where officer had reasonable grounds under s.22(g) and the Fugitive Offenders Act applied.
Habeas corpus — legality of warrantless arrest under s.22(g) Criminal Procedure Code — reasonable grounds from telegraphic signal — applicability of Fugitive Offenders Act 1881 — duty to inform arrested person truthfully — procedural irregularity in affidavit not fatal.
27 April 1963
March 1963
Re Diamond Kazoka ((1963 - 1964) Z and NRLR 1) [1963] ZMHCNR 3 (23 March 1963)
A magistrate's court has inherent jurisdiction to punish for contempt where a person fails to attend a judgment summons.
Contempt of court — failure to attend a judgment summons — Order 38 r.15 and s.44 Subordinate Courts Ordinance — s.99 Penal Code (summary contempts) — inherent jurisdiction of a court of record to punish contempts in its face — magistrate’s summary punishment upheld.
23 March 1963
1
Current page, page 1
>