Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 1985 June
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
September
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
September
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
June 1985
Nyirenda v Kapiri Glass Products Limited (S.C.Z. Judgment 16 of 1985) [1985] ZMSC 16 (6 June 1985)
Qualified privilege protected circulation of dismissal reasons to workplace participants, but not to the Senior Labour Officer under inapplicable regulations.
Tort — Libel — Qualified privilege — Publication of dismissal reasons to works council members and employees privileged under Industrial Relations Act s.69 (common interest) — Publication to Senior Labour Officer not privileged where notification regulation inapplicable
6 June 1985
Attorney-General v Kitenge (S.C.Z. Judgment 22 of 1985) [1985] ZMSC 15 (4 June 1985)
Uncontradicted sworn alibi allegations require State contradiction; language-formalities are directory if explained to the detainee.
Constitutional law — detention — grounds in writing and language requirement directory if explained in a language detainee understands; Habeas corpus — uncontradicted sworn allegation/alibi requires contradiction by State; Chisata and Lombe clarified
4 June 1985
1
Current page, page 1
>