Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 1992 November
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
February
March
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
February
March
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Chaila JJS
Gardner Ag. D.C.J
Lawrence JJS
Lawrence JS
Ngulube Ag. CJ
Sakala JJS
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
November 1992
Chibuye Canute Chabu v Zambia State Insurance Corporation Limited (SCZ APPEAL NO. 41 OF 1992) [1992] ZMSC 117 (25 November 1992)
An applicant alleging wrongful dismissal must plead and prove actual dismissal or a contractual breach, not mere redeployment.
Employment law — wrongful dismissal — constructive dismissal — redeployment versus dismissal — requirement to plead and prove breach of essential contractual term — no case to answer where claimant fails to establish primary facts.
25 November 1992
Alick Mutale Mulenga v The People (SCZ Appeal No. 60 of 1992) [1992] ZMSC 112 (3 November 1992)
Appeal dismissed: daylight identification and corroborative circumstances upheld conviction and 15‑year sentence.
Criminal law — Aggravated robbery — Identification evidence — Opportunity to observe in daylight and subsequent recognition by victims — Minor discrepancies in clothing descriptions not fatal to identification; corroboration by apprehension and police visit to scene.
3 November 1992
1
Current page, page 1
>