|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2006 |
|
|
A single judge of the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to grant injunctions or protective orders pending appeal.
Civil procedure – interlocutory relief – jurisdiction of a single judge of the Supreme Court to grant injunctions or protection orders pending appeal – protective orders equated with injunctions – later Supreme Court precedent governs over earlier conflicting decisions.
|
15 December 2006 |
|
Interlocutory valuation and purchase directives improperly pre-determined trial merits; stay and review applications were unfounded; appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure – interlocutory injunction – dissolution of ex-parte injunction – stay of execution – limits of stays when no enforceable order exists; Review under Order 39 r 1 – discretionary relief and fresh evidence requirements; Improper pre-determination of merits by interlocutory directives – valuation and purchase timetable set aside.
|
15 December 2006 |
|
Default judgments for failure to attend court‑annexed mediation are incompatible with mediation principles; recusal required for perceived bias.
Court‑annexed mediation — mediation philosophy and party rights — invalidity of rules permitting default judgment for failure to attend mediation; judicial recusal — perception of bias where judge previously presided over related criminal proceedings; mediator confidentiality — judge forbidden to rely on mediator’s record; rule amendment directed.
|
12 December 2006 |
| November 2006 |
|
|
A non‑Zambian entry‑permit holder who is not an 'established resident' cannot own land personally without Presidential written consent.
Land law – Non‑Zambians and land ownership – Interpretation of s.3(3) Lands Act read with Immigration and Deportation Act definitions of 'established'/'permanent' resident – requirement of President's written consent where non‑established resident seeks to hold land; Civil procedure – preliminary issues going to capacity – summary determination appropriate; Consent orders – irregularity where entered in absence of interested party and not endorsed as 'by consent' under Order 42 Rule 5A.
|
22 November 2006 |
| September 2006 |
|
|
The applicant who voluntarily accepted early retirement and was paid benefits cannot later claim redundancy absent evidence of abolition.
Employment law – early retirement versus redundancy/retrenchment – burden on employee to prove retirement benefits excluded allowances – voluntary acceptance of early retirement bars later redundancy claim where position not abolished.
|
26 September 2006 |
|
Applicant who elected early retirement and whose post continued could not treat the retirement as redundancy or exclude paid allowances.
Employment law — voluntary early retirement versus redundancy — burden on claimant to prove composition of retirement benefits; post abolition or downgrading necessary for redundancy; conditions of service interpretation.
|
26 September 2006 |
|
Joinder under Order 14 Rule 5 denied where employer disowned employee’s act; vicarious liability is a merits issue for trial.
Civil procedure – Joinder under Order 14 Rule 5 – Requirement that person joined may be entitled to or likely to be affected by result – Distinction between joinder and vicarious liability – Preliminary determination on affidavits.
|
26 September 2006 |
|
Whether appellants are vicariously liable for injuries caused by an unauthorised driver of their vehicle, given pleaded admissions.
Vicarious liability – employer’s liability for employee’s vehicle – unauthorised driver – admissions in pleadings – control and permission to drive.
|
26 September 2006 |
|
Section 281 is discretionary; leave to proceed is allowed where disputes cannot be properly resolved in the winding-up process.
Companies Act s281 — leave to commence or proceed with actions against company in liquidation — discretionary — purpose to ensure orderly administration of assets and protect creditors — leave appropriate where disputes (denial of liability, legal questions, assessment of damages) cannot be properly determined in winding-up.
|
25 September 2006 |
|
Application of s.35(a) IGPA held that a record tendered on 22 March was filed within a seven‑day court‑ordered period, Registry wrongly refused it.
Civil procedure — computation of time — Interpretation and General Provisions Act s.35(a) — excluding day of event when counting days — effect on filing deadlines and registry acceptance.
|
6 September 2006 |
| August 2006 |
|
|
Whether the applicant was estopped by pre-signed cheques and an executed debenture from denying indebtedness; appeal dismissed.
Debenture enforcement – validity of executed debenture for K1.2 billion; Estoppel – effect of pre-signed cheques signed by managing director; Burden of proof – onus on party alleging non-receipt; Evidence – non-calling of bank MD not necessarily fatal; Civil procedure – foreclosure order irregular if not pleaded; Corporate procedure – impropriety of suing a company under receivership rather than its receiver.
|
28 August 2006 |
|
Belief in witchcraft is not mitigating; first-offender manslaughter sentence reduced from 35 to 20 years.
Criminal law — Manslaughter; sentencing — excessive sentence reduced; belief in witchcraft not a mitigating circumstance; first-offender leniency.
|
8 August 2006 |
| July 2006 |
|
|
A single Judge of the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to grant an interim injunction pending appeal; such an order was set aside and costs awarded.
Civil procedure – interim injunction pending appeal – jurisdiction of a single Judge of the Supreme Court to grant injunctions – res judicata and effect of prior consent orders on property disputes – stay of execution – costs.
|
16 July 2006 |
|
Motion to review this Court's earlier decision dismissed; sale upheld and caveat joinder/lifting found proper, with no evidence of fraud.
Civil procedure — motion to review Supreme Court judgment — finality of litigation; Mortgage law — power of sale — requirement to comply with Order 30 Rule 14/Order 88 — sale before interlocutory orders; Caveat — joinder and lifting of caveat; Alleged misconduct by advocates.
|
13 July 2006 |
|
An equivocal guilty plea raising self-defence renders proceedings a nullity; conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
Criminal law – Guilty plea – Equivocal plea where defendant raises self-defence – Trial judge must enter a not guilty plea and try the case – Proceedings founded on an equivocal plea are a nullity – Conviction quashed and retrial ordered.
|
11 July 2006 |
|
Dismissal upheld where employee encashed third‑party cheques, written representations sufficed, and criminal withdrawal did not bar discipline.
Employment law – unfair dismissal; disciplinary procedure – written representations as hearing; double jeopardy – criminal withdrawal does not bar disciplinary action; misconduct – encashing third‑party cheques and dishonesty.
|
6 July 2006 |
|
Award for wrongful dismissal reduced to 12 months' salary at last received rate; insurance award set aside for lack of proof; interest ordered to compensate delay.
Employment law – wrongful dismissal – measure and period of damages for loss of earnings; two‑year guideline not automatic
Evidence – burden to prove contractual Conditions of Service (benefits/insurance)
Interest – compensation for inflation: short‑term deposit rate to judgment, lending rate thereafter
Leave – accrual computed to date of termination, paid at last salary. Speculative/general damages require cogent evidence
|
5 July 2006 |
|
Court upheld finding that the plaintiff purchased the farms, was misled into transferring them to the company, and that contested shares were void.
Property ownership – true purchaser of land – effect of leadership code enacted after acquisition; Company law – incorporation and share allocation – validity where only one party contributed land and cattle; Corporate governance – exclusion from management and right to account; Appeal – appellate deference to trial court's findings of fact.
|
5 July 2006 |
| June 2006 |
|
|
Whether a sitting tenant has an exclusive right to purchase adjacent subdivided council property offered for public sale.
Land law – Local authority subdivision and sale of council land – Interpretation of council resolution – Whether sales restricted to sitting tenants – Validity of offer to third party purchaser.
|
27 June 2006 |
|
A liquidator must note contingent claims but unsecured contingent creditors cannot obtain interim priority or block distributions under Sections 345–346.
Company law – Liquidation – Contingent and unascertained claims (s.345) – Order of priority of creditors (s.346) – Unsecured creditor’s rights – Mareva/freeze injunction – Interlocutory restraint on distributions.
|
27 June 2006 |
|
Employer justified in dismissing employees for unexplained diesel loss despite procedural breaches.
Employment law – Dismissal for negligence – Missing fuel loss (500 litres) – Proof and burden of loss – Procedural irregularities in disciplinary process – Natural justice – Zambia National Provident Fund v Chirwa principle.
|
7 June 2006 |
|
Applicant's Rule 78 motion to correct judgment over alleged omission about purchasing occupied house dismissed as meritless.
Civil procedure – Rule 78 Supreme Court Rules – correction of judgment for omissions or incidental slips – appellate court bound by record of appeal – documents produced after lower court judgment inadmissible to justify correction – Rule 78 not a vehicle to re-litigate decided issues.
|
7 June 2006 |
|
Motion to correct judgment under Rule 78 dismissed; court refused to reopen substantive issues beyond the record.
Civil procedure — Correction of judgment under Rule 78 — Alleged omissions/incidental slips — Appellate review confined to record — Fresh evidence not receivable via Rule 78 — Rule 78 not a means to relitigate substantive issues — No costs where respondent did not oppose.
|
7 June 2006 |
|
Confirming court cannot increase a subordinate magistrate's maximum sentence; consecutive terms upheld for separate child victims.
Criminal procedure — Sentencing powers of magistrates; scope of High Court confirmation/revision — confirming court cannot increase sentence beyond subordinate court's statutory maximum once exercised; consecutive versus concurrent sentences where multiple offences involve separate child victims.
|
7 June 2006 |
|
The appellant cannot use Rule 78 to review or reinterpret a judgment; it only corrects clerical errors.
Civil procedure – Rule 78 (clerical corrections) – Rule 78 confined to clerical errors, slips or omissions and cannot be used to review or reinterpret prior judgments; motion misconceived as review; prior finding that action was statute-barred.
|
7 June 2006 |
|
Evidence of shot tyres and spent cartridges upheld as sufficient proof of firearm use for aggravated robbery.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Use of firearm – Proof by shooting of vehicle tyres and recovery of spent cartridges – Non-recovery of weapon and non-exhibition of damaged property not fatal to conviction.
|
6 June 2006 |
|
The applicant’s breach of investment-certificate conditions justified revocation of his temporary permit despite procedural complaints.
Immigration law – Investment certificate – scope and conditions of certificate; Administrative law – revocation of temporary permit under section 21 Immigration and Deportation Act; Requirement to seek variation/assistance from Investment Centre; Procedural fairness and factual substratum for administrative decisions; Breach of permit conditions as ground for deportation.
|
6 June 2006 |
|
Dispute over quantum for wrongful dismissal: award two years' salary plus perquisites; terminal benefits excluded to avoid unjust enrichment.
Labour law – Wrongful dismissal – Quantum of damages – Measure: contractual or reasonable notice – Employee status and future prospects – Perquisites versus terminal benefits – Unjust enrichment – Interest on damages – Costs.
|
6 June 2006 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and an unchallenged potentially biased witness do not justify a murder conviction; conviction quashed.
Criminal law — Circumstantial evidence — Evaluation and cogency required for inference of guilt; witness bias (relative) and caution; trial misdirection; presumptions; proviso inapplicable — conviction quashed.
|
6 June 2006 |
|
Circumstantial evidence, corroborated suspect-witness testimony and the appellant’s conduct supported only the inference of guilt, so conviction affirmed.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Inference of guilt – Suspect witness corroboration – Attempts to procure alibi and bribe as evidentiary factors – Degree of cogency required to exclude reasonable alternatives.
|
6 June 2006 |
|
Appellate court upheld factual valuation of completed and extra works but ordered each party to bear their own costs.
Contract law — interpretation and valuation of completed works and verbal variations; assessment of extra works; set-off of prior payments and salvage; Judgments Act s.2 — post-judgment interest at current lending rate; costs — discretionary, weight to partial success and counterclaim.
|
6 June 2006 |
|
Appellate court upheld valuation of completed and extra works and interest discretion, but set aside costs order due to inadequate weight to payments and counter-claim.
Construction contracts – valuation of works on termination – inference from agreed contract sum; verbal variations and extra works – admissibility and assessment; post-judgment interest – discretionary under Judgment Act; costs – discretion and set-off where successful counter-claim and payments made.
|
6 June 2006 |
|
Court reduced a 20-year manslaughter sentence to 10 years due to guilty plea, youth, first-offender status and remorse.
Criminal law – Manslaughter – sentence – whether 20-year term with hard labour excessive – mitigation: guilty plea, youth, first offender, remorse – sentence reduced to 10 years.
|
6 June 2006 |
|
Court reduced an excessive mental‑distress award and set aside freezer‑hire damages after a short power disconnection.
Contract law – Damages for mental distress – Recoverability and proof; Assessment of quantum – proportionality to duration and severity; Appeal – misdirection on factual findings; Damages for hiring equipment – proof of non-performance required.
|
6 June 2006 |
| May 2006 |
|
|
An application to change awarded foreign-currency interest cannot be corrected under the slip rule as it challenges a substantive judicial decision.
Civil procedure – Rule 78 (slip rule) – correction of judgments – clerical errors versus judicial decisions – interest on foreign currency damages – finality of judgments and lack of jurisdiction to review own final decision.
|
29 May 2006 |
|
Slip rule cannot alter a deliberate judicial decision on interest; attempting to do so amounts to impermissible review.
Civil procedure – Rule 78 (slip rule) – correction of judgments – clerical error versus judicial reasoning; interest on foreign currency; finality of judgments; no jurisdiction to review own judgment outside appeal.
|
29 May 2006 |
|
A defendant’s demonstrated beneficiary interest justified lodging a caveat pending challenge to a purported conveyance.
Property law – caveat – sufficiency of interest to support caveat – beneficiary rights by transmission – dispute over validity of deed of gift and registration timing – interlocutory relief pending substantive challenge.
|
26 May 2006 |
|
A trial court must decide an independent counter-claim on its merits; dismissal of the main claim does not resolve it.
Civil procedure – counter-claim – duty of trial court to decide independent counter-claims on their merits – dismissal of main claim does not dispose of separate counter-claims – remittal to trial court.
|
19 May 2006 |
|
A court may not remit or overturn an arbitral award except for jurisdictional defects, serious irregularity, or a question of law.
Arbitration — scope of judicial interference — Order 73 grounds (want of jurisdiction, serious irregularity, question of law) — no general right of appeal from arbitral award — employment status of partner v. employee — currency of remuneration and leave pay.
|
11 May 2006 |
|
Whether pre-will insurance proceeds formed part of the testator's bank monies and whether equity should impose a constructive trust.
Wills and trusts – interpretation of "monies at my bank accounts" – inclusion of pre-will insurance proceeds; constructive trust and equity where settlor purports to cancel trust; admissibility and effect of offshore trust documents; addendum and authentication issues; privilege and cross-examination of trustee-related witness.
|
11 May 2006 |
|
Court reduces excessive K20,000,000 dog-bite award to K10,000,000, warns against global lump-sum damage awards.
Tort — negligence — dog bite — quantum of damages — excessiveness of award — consistency with prior awards and inflation — objection to lump-sum/global awards — correction of interest formula.
|
3 May 2006 |
| April 2006 |
|
|
Section 24 Restriction Notices need not name the specific offence and do not require a prior hearing; appeal allowed.
Anti-Corruption Act s24 – Restriction notices – No requirement to specify exact offence – Investigatory, not administrative, function – Audi alteram partem not required pre-issuance – Right to challenge under s24(5) – Section 24(3) duration/cancellation.
|
12 April 2006 |
|
A court martial including an investigating officer and a non-military public prosecutor is irregular and its convictions are null; co-accused death does not abate charges.
Defence/Service law — constitution of court martial — Section 89(2) Defence Act (investigating officers not to sit) — Section 88 membership requirements — ineligibility of civilian public prosecutor to sit — irregular court martial/nullity; Criminal procedure — effect of death of co-accused after close of prosecution case — charges do not "abate"; trial court must determine culpability as if deceased remained silent.
|
4 April 2006 |
|
Conviction based on a single, parade-driven identification using a unique physical feature was unsafe.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Single identifying witness – Fairness of identification parade – Unreliable corroboration – Unsafe conviction.
|
4 April 2006 |
| March 2006 |
|
|
Whether properties offered by directors in settlement transferred title absent formal deeds, and whether the claim was statute-barred.
Exchange Control settlement by surrender of land; written solicitor correspondence as evidence of transfer; apparent authority and estoppel; company internal formalities versus third-party rights; statute of limitations extinguishing land recovery rights; procedure for raising limitation defence.
|
29 March 2006 |
|
Delay does not justify awarding current value for lost chattels; damages are measured at time of loss, with interest for delay.
Civil torts – measure of damages – loss of chattels – value at time of loss is the normal measure; delay remediable by interest; awarding current value risks unjust enrichment.
|
28 March 2006 |
|
Central bank as liquidator owes a statutory and fiduciary duty to return assets and settle fiduciary accounts under s104(3)(a).
Banking law — Liquidation — Bank of Zambia as liquidator — Section 104(3)(a) Banking and Financial Services Act — obligation to return assets and settle fiduciary accounts — funds in suspense account held as fiduciary — priority/payment of judgment sums.
|
28 March 2006 |
|
In Commercial List default judgments an applicant must show a prima facie arguable defence on the merits, not merely explanations for default.
Commercial List – default judgment – setting aside under Order XII, Rule 2 – primary requirement is an arguable defence on the merits supported by prima facie evidence; explanation for default secondary; agency and apparent/ostensible authority established by correspondence; dispute over beneficiary versus principal liability.
|
24 March 2006 |
|
An appeal adjourned sine die must be restored before seeking dismissal for want of prosecution.
Civil procedure — Adjournment sine die with liberty to restore — Restoration required before pursuing dismissal for want of prosecution — Notice to proceed (Order 2 r.3 High Court Rules; Order 3 r.6 Rules of Supreme Court) — Dismissal for want of prosecution inadmissible without prior restoration.
|
24 March 2006 |
|
Joinder to post-judgment Industrial Relations Court proceedings requires a recognised legal interest and timely application; delay and lack of locus standi justify refusal.
Industrial Relations Court — Joinder of parties — Rule 32 — Locus standi — Post-judgment joinder — Statutory jurisdiction — Discretionary powers — Delay and sleep on rights.
|
14 March 2006 |