Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 2009 May
4 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Chibomba JS
Chitengi JS
Mambilima DCJ
Mumba JS
Sakala CJ
Silomba
Silomba JS
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 4 judgments found.
4 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
May 2009
Chipasha and Ors v Swarp Spinning Mills PLC (Appeal 129 of 2006) [2009] ZMSC 146 (14 May 2009)
A Rule 78 slip-rule motion cannot be used to reopen or review a final judgment; such abuse is dismissible with costs.
Civil procedure — Appellate procedure — Rule 78 (slip rule) — Limitation to correction of clerical errors and accidental slips — No jurisdiction to reopen final judgment on merits — Abuse of court process — Costs.
14 May 2009
July Danobo T/A Juldan Motors v Chimsoro Farms Ltd (SCZ Judgement 15 of 2009) [2009] ZMSC 166 (14 May 2009)
Failure to compile a complete Record of Appeal as required by the Rules warrants dismissal and costs awarded against counsel for misrepresentation.
Civil procedure — Record of Appeal — Requirement to include proceedings/transcript under Rule 58 — Non‑compliance sanctions under Rule 68(2) — Filing incomplete supplementary record — Counsel’s misrepresentation and professional misconduct — Costs against counsel.
14 May 2009
Patel v Surma Stationers Ltd and Ors (SCZ Judgement 12 of 2009) [2009] ZMSC 167 (14 May 2009)
Court allowed plaintiff's leave to amend, holding amendments arose from same facts and did not introduce a new cause.
Civil procedure — Amendment of pleadings — Order 18 rule 1 High Court Rules; Order 20 rule 5 Rules of the Supreme Court — Adding or substituting a new cause of action allowed if arising out of same or substantially same facts — Prejudice and interests of justice — Leave to amend granted.
14 May 2009
Mindeco Small Minning Ltd v Sichone (SCZ 8 197 of 2006) [2009] ZMSC 3 (13 May 2009)
A judge is not functus officio merely because he dismissed a misconceived application; proper application for leave to file appeal record out of time must be considered.
Civil procedure — late filing of record of appeal — distinction between application to extend time and application for leave to file record out of time — functus officio — when a judge may be precluded from further acting.
13 May 2009
1
Current page, page 1
>