Supreme Court of Zambia - 2015

110 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
110 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2015
Whether administrative military discharge complied with Defence Act regulations and whether alleged discrimination or clerical errors invalidated it.
Defence law – administrative discharge under Regulation 9(3) and s.21 – inapplicability of s.79 (Part V offences) – clerical error in discharge paperwork not fatal – Employment Act not applicable to defence personnel – burden of proof for discrimination.
10 December 2015
2 December 2015
November 2015
27 November 2015
Whether a dollar-denominated price indexed to Kwacha was illegal under S.I. No.33/2012 or enforceable in Kwacha.
Contract law — Illegality — Quotation of prices in foreign currency — S.I
No. 33 of 2012 Reg. 4(1) — Indexation to Kwacha — S.I
No. 78 of 2012 — Enforceability — Conversion at prevailing spot rate
27 November 2015
A letter 'subject to contract' did not create an enforceable sale of land; landlord entitled to possession and costs.
Property law – sale of land 'subject to contract' – offer letters conditional on formal contract do not create binding conveyance; Rent Act and lease re-entry for unpaid rent; specific performance requires complete enforceable agreement.
24 November 2015
An appeal based on inconsistent appeal documents and a late amendment request is incompetent and dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – Appeal – Memorandum of appeal must comply with Rule 58(2) – Inconsistent notice of appeal and grounds – Amendment of memorandum sought late – Prejudice to respondent – Appeal held incompetent and dismissed.
24 November 2015
Appeal dismissed as incompetent where memorandum and grounds attacked different orders and late amendment was refused.
Civil procedure – appeal – memorandum of appeal must identify the judgment appealed against – non-compliance with Rule 58(2)/(3) – late amendment to grounds of appeal refused – appeal held incompetent – costs awarded.
24 November 2015
Court affirmed limited discretion to pierce notice terminations but found insufficient evidence of malice; appeal dismissed.
Industrial Relations Court – discretion to look behind contractual termination-by-notice clause – may pierce veil to redress injustice but must be exercised judicially; party seeking to pierce must adduce sufficient evidence, at least prima facie, of malice or ulterior motive – burden on claimant to prove unfair termination on balance of probabilities – appellate restraint on trial court credibility findings.
19 November 2015
Court affirms limited discretion to pierce termination clause; appellants failed to prove malice, appeal dismissed.
Employment law — termination by notice clause — Industrial Relations Court may look behind termination to ascertain real reason, but discretion must be exercised judiciously; burden on employee to adduce prima facie evidence of malice; appellate restraint on disturbing trial credibility findings.
19 November 2015
12 November 2015
Whether occupants as licensees, not tenants, were entitled to buy quasi‑government houses; mesne profits and eviction ordered.
Property law; quasi‑government housing sales; sitting tenant/licencee distinction; Home Empowerment Policy eligibility; Rent Act s.3(2) exclusion; mesne profits for wrongful occupation; costs in discretionary awards.
10 November 2015
10 November 2015
Court allowed a belated amendment of defence where delay was not solely applicant’s fault and no irreparable prejudice shown.
Civil procedure – Amendment of pleadings – Discretion under Order 18 Rule 1 – Factors: attitude of parties, nature of amendment, timing, reasons for delay, necessity to determine real issues – Delay and prejudice – Costs as compensatory remedy where prejudice not irreparable.
10 November 2015
Appellate court found misdirected credibility findings, acquitted the 2nd appellant, affirmed murder convictions of 1st and 3rd, increased sentences.
Criminal law – murder – joint unlawful enterprise (section 22) – credibility assessment of witnesses – malice aforethought (section 204) – provocation and drunkenness as extenuation – appellate review of conflicting evidence.
4 November 2015
4 November 2015
A dream does not, without supporting evidence of a belief in witchcraft, constitute an extenuating circumstance to avoid the death sentence.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentencing – Whether a dream or claimed belief in witchcraft amounts to extenuating circumstances reducing a death sentence – Missing trial record – appellate review when judgment and primary facts are available.
3 November 2015
Court reduced appellant's excessive 15-year sentence for trafficking 22.7g marijuana to the statutory minimum of 10 years.
Criminal law – Narcotic Drugs – Trafficking small quantity (22.7g) – Sentencing – Excessive sentence – Plea of guilty as mitigating factor – Prior conviction/community service non-compliance to be addressed by proper procedure – Statutory minimum sentence substituted.
3 November 2015
Conviction for murder quashed where reasonable doubt existed whether fatal injuries followed an accidental fall rather than intentional harm.
Criminal law - Murder - Malice aforethought - Burden of proof and reasonable doubt - Evaluation of circumstantial and witness evidence - Appellate review of credibility and holistic assessment of evidence - Death sentence set aside where guilt not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
3 November 2015
Appeal dismissed; applicant fit for trial; conviction substituted for defilement and sentence increased to 25 years.
Criminal law – sexual offences – defilement v. indecent assault; fitness to plead and insanity at trial – test and timing of medical inquiry; corroboration by medical evidence (STIs); aggravating factors and sentence increase for breach of trust and infection of child.
3 November 2015
October 2015
Non-compliance with mandatory Rule 58(2) by framing argumentative or mixed-up grounds renders an appeal incompetent.
Civil procedure – Appeals – Supreme Court Rules – Rule 58(2) mandatory: grounds of appeal must be concise, under distinct heads and without argument; Rule 19 discretionary on preliminary objections; defective or 'mixed-up' grounds render appeal incompetent.
30 October 2015
Leave for judicial review refused where appellants had alternative appeal and failed to show procedural impropriety or irrationality.
Societies Act (s8, Rule 8) – requirement to give reasons for refusal of registration; judicial review – leave to apply (Order 53 RSC) – filtering frivolous/hopeless claims; alternative remedy/appeal to Minister bars judicial review; procedural impropriety; Wednesbury unreasonableness.
27 October 2015
September 2015
The applicant's appeal dismissed because the order granting the respondent unconditional leave to defend is not appealable under Section 24(1)(b).
Civil procedure – default judgment – setting aside default judgment – leave to defend – conditional v. unconditional leave – appealability under section 24(1)(b) Supreme Court Act – time and costs directions do not convert unconditional leave into conditional leave.
30 September 2015
A court may order joinder at any stage, including on appeal, where interested parties’ rights in the subject matter will be affected.
Joinder of parties – Order 14 Rule 5 High Court Rules and Order 15 Rule 4(1) Supreme Court Rules – applicability to appeals – joinder at any stage to avoid multiplicity – interest in subject matter and locus standi.
17 September 2015
Employees who refused a lateral transfer during a lawful consolidation were deemed to have resigned, not entitled to redundancy.
Employment law — Corporate consolidation and transfer of contracts — Section 35 Employment Act (consent to transfer) — lateral transfer vs redundancy — deemed resignation for refusal to consent — continuity of employment; evidentiary role of labour officer presence.
10 September 2015
Liability was res judicata; appellate court upheld damages that accounted for depreciation and were supported by unchallenged evidence.
Tort — vicarious liability — res judicata where same accident previously adjudicated; Evidence — res gestae and hearsay; Damages — assessment of damaged chattels accounting for depreciation; General vs special damages; Appellate review of factual findings.
10 September 2015
Whether a third party mortgage and consent created a continuing security for future facilities and whether guarantees/debenture were enforceable.
Mortgage law – construction of mortgage and consent – continuing security for future/additional facilities; originating summons in mortgage actions; enforcement of debenture and personal guarantees together; undue influence and bank's duty to ensure guarantor's understanding.
9 September 2015
Substantial loss alone did not justify retirement with full benefits; absent special circumstances damages equal to three months' salary awarded.
Employment law – disciplinary sanctions – substitution of summary dismissal with warning for first offender; wrongful/unfair dismissal remedies – retirement with benefits versus damages; normal measure of damages absent special circumstances.
9 September 2015
A court should not grant interlocutory injunctions solely on a counter-claim; where needed the injunction may restrain both parties to preserve the status quo.
Interlocutory injunctions — procedural prerequisites and judicial discretion; injunctions ordinarily by summons supported by affidavit and undertaking as to damages — counter-claim and opposing affidavit cannot substitute an application; certificate of title v. equitable/contractual claim — prospects of success and preservation of status quo; balance of convenience; extension of injunctive relief to both parties to prevent fait accompli.
9 September 2015
Trial judge’s reliance on extraneous facts and neighbourhood prejudice made a 20-year sentence excessive; reduced to 10 years.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Excessive sentence — Trial judge relying on facts outside prosecutor's statement — Bias from adverse comments about accused's residence — Fair trial rights — Sentencing principles (antecedents, plea, prevalence).
9 September 2015
Failure by the appellant to lodge the record within the mandatory 60 days renders the appeal incompetent.
Civil procedure — Appeals — Mandatory compliance with Rule 54 SCR (lodging Record of Appeal within 60 days) — Computation of time — Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays excluded only when time limited is less than six days — Reported editorial errors not binding — Appeal dismissed as incompetent.
9 September 2015
Inaccurate, non-contemporaneous court-reporting is not privileged; defamatory publication warrants general but not necessarily punitive damages.
Defamation — report of court proceedings — requirement that report be contemporaneous, fair and accurate for absolute privilege under s.8 Defamation Act — omission of consent settlement defeats privilege; falsity and malice presumed where words are defamatory; damages presumed without proof of actual injury; exemplary damages require contumelious conduct.
9 September 2015
A cogent chain of circumstantial facts can sustain a murder conviction despite unexplained possession of the victim's phone.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – conviction requires cogent, cumulative chain of facts excluding innocent hypothesis; Recent possession doctrine inapplicable to murder; burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt; evidence available only to police – presumption but displaceable; appellate review of credibility findings.
8 September 2015
Failure to show fresh material evidence under Order 39; appeal incompetent and dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – Review under Order 39 – requirement of fresh material evidence – Service of process on local agent versus foreign company – Misjoinder/wrong service as ground of appeal – Competence of appeal where notice and grounds conflict.
8 September 2015
Dismissal for unauthorised public fund payments was fair; procedural defects do not invalidate dismissal where the offence warrants dismissal.
Employment law – unfair dismissal – unauthorised payment of public funds – disciplinary procedure – prior warning – effect of procedural non‑compliance where offence warrants dismissal – burden of proof in unfair dismissal claims.
8 September 2015
The appellant failed to recover fees from the 3rd respondent because it did not prove a retainer or instructions by that respondent.
Solicitors' fees – retainer – burden of proof to establish retainer – payment as deposit – corporate veil – lifting veil only on evidence of agency/instruction – costs follow the event.
4 September 2015
1 September 2015
August 2015
Appeal struck off the cause list for non-compliance with an order to pay security for costs; no costs ordered for that sitting.
Civil procedure — Security for costs — Requirement to pay security prior to hearing an appeal — Non-compliance renders matter improperly listed — Striking appeal off cause list — Discretion as to costs.
28 August 2015
Whether a separation-pay dispute filed 11–12 months after termination was time-barred under section 85(3) of the Industrial Relations Act.
Industrial Relations Act s85(3) — limitation period — exhaustion of administrative channels — extension of time — Rules 48 & 55 — inordinate delay; reliance on non-employment authority for late filing principles.
27 August 2015
Appeal dismissed: review out of time, no fresh evidence, and stay rightly refused because mortgage guarantee precluded a viable defence.
Mortgage/security – guarantor/suretyship – enforcement of mortgage; Review of judgment – requirement for fresh evidence and timeliness; Stay of execution – court’s discretion and assessment of prospects of appeal; New issues on appeal – inadmissibility if not raised below.
26 August 2015
A registered proprietor’s certificate prevents title by adverse possession; the statute of limitations cannot defeat registered title.
Limitation Act 1939 s4(3) — adverse possession required for limitation to run; Lands and Deeds Registry Act s35 — certificate of title bars acquisition by adverse possession; Order 14A RSC — interlocutory disposal may include necessary factual findings; certificate of title conclusive (s33/s34).
26 August 2015
Winding-up must be commenced by petition; ex-parte provisional liquidator appointment without a petition is irregular and discharged.
Companies Act — winding-up proceedings must be commenced by petition; provisional liquidator may only be appointed after presentation of a winding-up petition; Companies (Winding-Up) Rules binding — orders appointing provisional liquidators must specify property and duties; mode of commencement and joinder — court will not cure non-joinder where joinder was not urged.
26 August 2015
Court upheld termination under a contractual notice clause, refusing to pierce it absent sufficient evidence of malice.
Employment law – contractual termination-on-notice – power to pierce termination clause discretionary – burden to prove malice on employee – separation benefits contractual; damages limited to notice period.
20 August 2015
A statutory limitation defence may be raised as a preliminary point; cause of action accrued when the title was issued, appeal dismissed.
19 August 2015
A restructured loan agreement supersedes earlier breaches and a borrower’s counterclaim does not defeat a mortgagee’s right to possession.
Mortgage law – restructured facility superseding prior loans – counterclaim for lender’s breaches cannot defeat mortgagee’s right to possession – proof of indebtedness by affidavit and statement of account – late-raised contractual certificate argument inadmissible on appeal – interest payable on established judgment sum.
19 August 2015
Whether an employee was redundant after being offered an alternative role; court held the alternative suitable and dismissed redundancy and constructive dismissal claims.
Employment law – redundancy – written employment contract – clause governing redeployment – section 26B inapplicable to written contracts – suitability of alternative employment – coercion – constructive dismissal – damages for mental distress – jurisdiction of Industrial Relations Court.
19 August 2015
Court granted conditional withdrawal of Record of Appeal to cure procedural filing defect; failure to refile within 14 days results in dismissal.
Civil procedure – Appeals – Withdrawal of Record of Appeal – Whether withdrawal equals dismissal of appeal – Compliance with amended Rule 58 (SI No.26/2012) – Conditional leave to withdraw to cure procedural defect – Costs awarded to respondent.
19 August 2015
19 August 2015
12 August 2015
12 August 2015
6 August 2015