Skip to document content Skip to main menu Skip to search

Subordinate Court of Zambia

105 judgments
Advanced search
Skip past years
Filters
Skip to results
105 judgments
March 2009
The People v Lt General Geojago Robert Chaswe Musengule and Anor (SPB/120/2004) [2009] ZMSUB 1 (2 March 2009)
Court convicted the first and second accused for abuse of office and corrupt practices under the Anti‑Corruption Act.
  • Anti‑Corruption Act — abuse of office (s37(2)(a)) — corrupt practices (ss29(1),29(2)) — presumption under s49(2) — admissibility/weight of foreign invoices and bank transfer records — failure to follow public procurement/tender procedures — indirect benefit through third party (property acquisition).
2 March 2009
April 1968
City Council of Ndola V Colcom Co-operative (Zambia) Limited (182 of 1968) [1968] ZMSUB 1 (11 April 1968)
Delivery to an independent carrier prima facie transfers property to the buyer; prosecution failed to prove unwholesome goods at sale.
  • Sale of Goods Act s.18 — Delivery to carrier prima facie delivery to buyer; carrier neither party’s agent presumed agent of buyer; property passes on delivery to carrier; burden on prosecution to prove goods unwholesome at time of sale.
11 April 1968
October 1967
People v Makhokha (173 of 1967) [1967] ZMSUB 1 (24 October 1967)
Distinct Customs offences should not be combined; uncautioned routine customs questions admissible absent reasonable suspicion.
  • Customs law — smuggling (s.164) and failure to produce customs documents (s.47) are distinct offences; duplicity in charging; admissibility of uncautioned statements by customs officers where no reasonable suspicion existed; burden of proof in exportation cases; circumstantial evidence and drawing inferences.
24 October 1967
August 1965
Heuff v Mbewe (111 of 1965) [1965] ZMSUB 1 (18 August 1965)
A Minister’s properly supported State privilege claim may bar production of official documents, and limited circulation does not destroy that privilege.
  • Evidence — State (Crown) privilege for official documents; Minister's affidavit and personal inspection; court may inspect documents in camera and may override claim in rare cases; limited circulation does not necessarily destroy privilege; secondary evidence excluded if privilege upheld; public interest (candour in ministerial communications) vs interests of justice.
18 August 1965
Heuff v Mbewe (ZR 111 (SC)) [1965] ZMSUB 2 (17 August 1965)
Court upheld State privilege for official conciliation-related documents, allowing inspection but deferring to the Minister if doubt exists.
  • State privilege — ministerial affidavit and class description — court inspection of documents — balancing public interest and justice — candour in industrial conciliation communications — limited circulation does not destroy privilege — secondary evidence inadmissible.
17 August 1965