Civil Procedure

8 documents
Skip to results
Civil Procedure

Results. 8 documents found.

8 documents
Judgment 13 May 2020
A party likely to be affected by reissued exploration rights ought to be joined under Order 14/5(1) HCR.
  • Procedure — Joinder of parties — Order 14/5(1) HCR and Order 15/4(1) RSC — person entitled to or claiming interest in the subject matter or likely to be affected — ministerial cancellation and reissuance of petroleum exploration licence — discretion to join aimed at effective adjudication — distinction from Abel Mulenga.
Judgment 28 November 2018
Court quashed verbal timber export ban for illegality, ordered licences issued; damages claim dismissed.
  • Judicial review — Forests Act (ss. 50, 53, 62) — Illegality and procedural impropriety for failure to give written notice and show cause — Ministerial verbal export ban unsupported by statute — Mandamus to statutory officer to issue/renew licences — Damages/compensation dismissed; s.56(1)(b) bars compensation.
Judgment 28 July 2018
Judgment 23 February 2018
Court allowed final extension to file record of appeal, finding delay not inordinate nor prejudicial.
  • Civil procedure — appeal — extension of time to file record of appeal — Order 13 Rule 3(3) Court of Appeal Rules — inordinate delay a question of fact — prejudice to respondent — dismissal for want of prosecution.
Judgment 28 November 2017
EIA consultation rights extend beyond title holders; subsequent consultations and agency approvals can cure initial EIA defects.
  • Environmental law — Environmental Impact Assessment — right to be consulted not limited to title holders; scope and cure of EIA defects; discretionary admission of further evidence on appeal; mining licence outsourcing permitted where affiliate licensed; reliance on agency approvals and mitigation conditions
Judgment 30 October 2014
Whether land grants made during de‑gazettement remain valid and whether allocations after re‑gazettement without statutory authority are lawful.
  • Forest law — de‑gazettement and re‑gazettement — validity of grants made during de‑gazetted period; Administrative law — judicial review — illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety of grants made after re‑gazettement without statutory authority; Civil procedure — availability of declaratory relief in judicial review and counter‑claims (Order 53).
Judgment 10 January 2006
A first‑class magistrate may be deputed within the district without formal transfer unless the case is part‑heard.
  • Criminal procedure — Transfer of cases — Deputation of a first‑class magistrate within same district — No formal transfer required if case not part‑heard; part‑heard or remission to lower class requires formal transfer
  • Judicial discipline — Unlawful discharge of accused amounts to nullity and abuse of process
Judgment 7 April 1980