Mwewa and Others v Attorney General and Others (2017/HP/204) [2017] ZMHC 77 (9 October 2017);

Primary tabs


Petition by three persons with psychosocial disabilities and the Mental Health Users Network of Zambia (MHUNZA) to repeal the Mental Disorders Act of 1949 in Mwewa and Others v the Attorney General and Others. The Petitioners argue that the Act unconstitutionally infringes on the rights to dignity, liberty and to freedom from discrimination of persons with mental disabilities and denies persons with mental disabilities the protection of the legal capacity as required by the 2012 Persons with Disabilities Act. This is due, amongst others, to the following features of the Mental Disorders Act:

it’s use of discriminatory and derogatory language to describe and categorise persons with mental disabilities;
its sanction of detention of persons with disabilities on grounds of their disability, including in criminal detention facilities;
it’s permissions of psychiatric treatment without informed consent;
it’s denial of legal capacity to persons with mental disabilities without equal and effective protection of the law; and
the creation of a two-tier healthcare system depriving persons with mental disabilities with access to mental healthcare services at primary healthcare level and failing to provide adequate and appropriate healthcare and rehabilitation.

On 9 October 2017, the High Court declared a definitional provision of the Act unconstitutional and invalid, criticising the Act on human rights grounds. While declining to grant the full relief sought by the Petitioners,  the Court called for a “thorough review”of the Mental Disorders Act. It further affirmed that all persons with mental disabilities should be treated humanely at all mental health facilities, raising concern with treatment and conditions the Court described as torture and inhumane treatment. The Court further affirmed that all persons with disabilities have a right to receive healthcare services without discrimination and that mental health services should be made available at primary health care level.


Download Full Judgment: