Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Court of Appeal of Zambia
Court of Appeal of Zambia - 1965 October
2 judgments
Advanced search
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2006
2001
1976
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2006
2001
1976
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
April
May
June
July
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
April
May
June
July
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Doyle JA
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
October 1965
Sitali and Ors v People (CAZ 8 137 of 1965) [1965] ZMCA 14 (22 October 1965)
The appellants’ sentences quashed where magistrate and High Court sentenced them for an offence they had not been convicted of.
Court of Appeal jurisdiction — appeal against conviction — sentencing — conviction and sentence for wrong offence — s.14(3) Court of Appeal Ordinance — s.197A(1) Criminal Procedure Code — sentences quashed and matter remitted to subordinate court.
22 October 1965
Van Zyl v People (CAZ 8 140 of 1965) [1965] ZMCA 18 (22 October 1965)
A judge may change sentence on new material, but welfare reports must be evidence and counsel heard.
Criminal procedure — sentencing — judge may revise provisional decision on receipt of new material; welfare officer's report material to sentence must be introduced as evidence and be open to cross‑examination; where circumstances change after the accused's case, counsel must be given an opportunity to address the court; courts concerned with prison conditions only insofar as they affect suitability for particular treatment.
22 October 1965
1
Current page, page 1
>