Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Court of Appeal of Zambia
Court of Appeal of Zambia - 1965 June
3 judgments
Advanced search
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2006
2001
1976
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2006
2001
1976
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
April
May
June
July
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
April
May
June
July
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Blagden CJ
Blagden JA
Dennison J
Evans J
Whelan J
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
June 1965
Patel Bazaar Ltd v People (CAZ 8 84 of 1965) [1965] ZMCA 11 (26 June 1965)
An accused must prove a high-standard 'reasonable excuse' to avoid absolute liability for selling unwholesome food.
Criminal law — absolute liability; public health — sale of unwholesome food; section 79(1) Public Health Ordinance; 'reasonable excuse' defence; burden on accused; packaging not a defence.
26 June 1965
Lubesha v The People (ZR 82 (CA)) [1965] ZMCA 4 (16 June 1965)
A High Court refusal to extend time for appeal is not appealable under section 13(1) of the Court of Appeal Ordinance.
Court of Appeal jurisdiction — Appealability of High Court refusal to extend time for appeal — Construction of s.13(1) Court of Appeal Ordinance — Application to extend time is not an appeal — Ralph v R applied.
16 June 1965
Simpson v Turton (CAZ 8 79 of 1965) [1965] ZMCA 13 (4 June 1965)
An appeal 'deemed dismissed' under rule 54(1) may be revived; deeming can create a rebuttable presumption and relief granted.
Civil procedure — Appeal revival — Effect of a statutory 'deeming' provision under Court of Appeal Rules — Rule 54(1) construed as creating a rebuttable presumption; appeal capable of being revived and extension of time granted; interplay with rule 67(3).
4 June 1965
1
Current page, page 1
>