Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Collections
Case indexes
Environmental
Minerals and energy
8 documents
Advanced search
Filters
Skip to results
Minerals and energy
Filters
Years
Skip to next filter group
2021
2018
2017
2013
1980
Topics
Skip to next filter group
Administrative Action
Civil Procedure
Frivolous, vexatious, nuisance proceedings
Injunctions and interdicts
Judicial Review
Minerals and energy
Minerals, oil and gas
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 8 documents found.
8 documents
Title
Sort by Title ascending
Date
Sort by Date ascending
Tukongote Mining Limited v The Attorney General & Another (HP 1954 of 2014) [2021] ZMHC 11 (30 July 2021)
Payment of fees after licence expiry does not entitle the applicant to reinstatement where the area is already licensed.
Mines and Minerals Act — expiry versus renewal of mining rights — application versus renewal; annual/area charges; allocation of vacated areas; public officer not per se disqualified from holding mining rights; burden of proof on applicant.
Judgment
30 July 2021
RAE Zambia Limited v The Attorney General & Another (Appeal 112 of 2018) [2018] ZMCA 403 (28 November 2018)
A party likely to be affected by reissued exploration rights ought to be joined under Order 14/5(1) HCR.
Procedure — Joinder of parties — Order 14/5(1) HCR and Order 15/4(1) RSC — person entitled to or claiming interest in the subject matter or likely to be affected — ministerial cancellation and reissuance of petroleum exploration licence — discretion to join aimed at effective adjudication — distinction from Abel Mulenga.
Judgment
28 November 2018
Sahne Mining Zambia Limited (Appeal 83 of 2017) [2018] ZMCA 402 (12 June 2018)
High Court retains jurisdiction to hear trespass and nuisance claims where respondents lack mining or non-mining rights.
Mining Appeals Tribunal — scope of jurisdiction — Sections 96–98, 100 Mines and Minerals Development Act — original versus appellate jurisdiction — statutory interpretation — trespass and nuisance claims against persons without mining rights — mode of commencement and jurisdiction.
Judgment
12 June 2018
United Quarries Limited v Chongwe District Council (HP 1001 of 2007) [2018] ZMHC 322 (23 February 2018)
Judgment
23 February 2018
Katenge Resources Ltd v Avarmma Mining Company Ltd and Ors (CAZ 8 78 of 2017) [2017] ZMCA 144 (28 November 2017)
Court allowed final extension to file record of appeal, finding delay not inordinate nor prejudicial.
Civil procedure — appeal — extension of time to file record of appeal — Order 13 Rule 3(3) Court of Appeal Rules — inordinate delay a question of fact — prejudice to respondent — dismissal for want of prosecution.
Judgment
28 November 2017
China Copper Mines Limited v Tikumbe Mining Limited (Appeal 17 of 2017) [2017] ZMHC 505 (14 September 2017)
A court cannot enter judgment on admission based on interlocutory findings; admissions must be clear and unconditional.
Civil procedure — Judgment on admission — admissions must be clear, unequivocal and unconditional — Order 21 HCR and Order 27 RSC; Interlocutory injunction — limits of findings at interlocutory stage; affidavit evidence incomplete and not substitute for trial; discretion to enter judgment on admission; remittal for trial.
Judgment
14 September 2017
Storti Mining Ltd v Twampane Mining Co-operative Society Ltd (HK/ARB 1 of 2006) [2013] ZMHC 5 (21 March 2013)
Court appointed a receiver over the mining licence by equitable execution, dispensing with the affidavit of fitness and denying a separate injunction.
Equitable execution; appointment of receiver over mining licence; adequacy of property description; dispensing with affidavit of fitness under Order 30(1)(7) RSC; injunction ancillary to receivership; failure of fi.fa execution
Judgment
21 March 2013
People v Masauso and Another (HNR 252 of 1980) [1980] ZMHC 10 (7 April 1980)
A first‑class magistrate may be deputed within the district without formal transfer unless the case is part‑heard.
Criminal procedure — Transfer of cases — Deputation of a first‑class magistrate within same district — No formal transfer required if case not part‑heard; part‑heard or remission to lower class requires formal transfer
Judicial discipline — Unlawful discharge of accused amounts to nullity and abuse of process
Judgment
7 April 1980
1
Current page, page 1
>