Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Constitutional Court of Zambia
Constitutional Court of Zambia - 2019 November
3 judgments
Advanced search
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
May
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
May
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Chibomba JP
Chibomba PC Sitali JCC Mulenga JCC Mulembe JCC Mulonda JCC Munalula JCC Musaluke JCC
Mulembe JCC
Mulembe JCC Mulonda JCC Munalula JCC
Mulenga JCC
Mulonda JCC
Musaluke JCC
Sitali JCC
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
November 2019
Law Association of Zambia & Another v Attorney-General (13 of 2019; 14 of 2019) [2019] ZMCC 18 (29 November 2019)
Whether the Constitutional Court may judicially review a proposed constitutional amendment bill for compliance with national values and principles.
Constitutional law — Jurisdiction of Constitutional Court — Whether Court may review or quash a proposed bill before enactment; application of national values and principles (Arts. 8, 9, 61); limits of Article 128 jurisdiction.
29 November 2019
Mulubisha v Attorney-General (13 of 2018) [2019] ZMCC 17 (27 November 2019)
Sections 3–7 of the Chiefs Act conflict with Article 165 and are void; chieftaincy recognition must follow customary processes.
Constitutional law — supremacy of the Constitution — Article 165 guarantees chieftaincy per culture and forbids legislation conferring recognition or withdrawal powers — Sections 3–7 Chiefs Act inconsistent and void.
27 November 2019
Law Association of Zambia & Another v Attorney-General (2019/CCZ/0013; 2019/CCZ/0014) [2019] ZMCC 27 (25 November 2019)
Order VIII rule 1(1) requires physical presence for oral evidence; video-link testimony disallowed absent agreement or protocol.
Constitutional procedure — Evidence — Order VIII r.1(1): oral evidence in open court implies physical presence unless parties agree; alternatives (affidavits, dispensation, interrogatories) available; video‑link testimony not permitted absent procedural protocol or parties’ agreement.
25 November 2019
1
Current page, page 1
>