|
Whether the President's non‑occupation of the official residence breached public‑finance principles and was justiciable in the Constitutional Court.
Constitutional law – presidential residence – Articles 173 and 198 (guiding values/principles of public service and public finance) – no express duty to occupy State House – burden to prove gazette or presidential decision – jurisdictional limit: enforcement of Bill of Rights (Part III) lies with High Court (Article 28) – declaratory relief not a vehicle for compulsion.
|