Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Constitutional Court of Zambia
Constitutional Court of Zambia - 2018 September
3 judgments
Advanced search
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
August
September
October
November
December
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Filters
Judges
Mulenga JCC Mulembe JCC Mulenga JCC Munalula JCC Musaluke JCC
Mulenga JCC Mulembe JCC Mulonda JCC Munalula JCC Musaluke JCC
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
3 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 2018
Robert Chiseke Taundi v Naluwa (Appeal 12 of 2017) [2018] ZMCC 253 (24 September 2018)
Appeal dismissed for failure to prove bribery, violence, or widespread misconduct preventing majority voter choice.
Electoral law — Election petition — Standard for nullifying parliamentary election — s97(2)(a) majority threshold — bribery and intimidation — hearsay admissibility — credibility of partisan witnesses.
24 September 2018
Taundi v Naluwa (Appeal 12 of 2017) [2018] ZMCC 251 (24 September 2018)
Appellant failed to prove bribery, violence or misconduct sufficiently widespread to void the election.
Electoral law — election petitions — admissibility of hearsay; standard of proof for nullifying elections under s97(2)(a) — requirement that corrupt/illegal acts be committed by candidate or with knowledge/consent of agent and be widespread to have prevented majority of voters from electing preferred candidate; bribery and electoral violence — necessity of corroboration and linkage to candidate; assessment of partisan witness credibility.
24 September 2018
Mutembo Nchito v Attorney General (29 of 2016) [2018] ZMCC 252 (7 September 2018)
An application to issue subpoenas in the Constitutional Court requires leave by motion/notice and subpoenas duces tecum must specify documents; non-compliant subpoenas set aside.
Civil procedure — subpoenas — Constitutional Court exercising original jurisdiction — default to Supreme Court Practice (1999) — Order 38 Rule 19(3) RSC — leave to issue subpoenas by motion/notice — subpoena duces tecum requires particularity of documents — grounds for setting aside: irregularity, oppression, confidentiality, privilege.
7 September 2018
1
>