Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Constitutional Court of Zambia
Constitutional Court of Zambia - 2022 December
2 judgments
Advanced search
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Mulonda JCC Musaluke JCC Chisunka JCC
Sitali JCC Mulonda JCC Mulenga JCC Musaluke JCC Chisunka JCC
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Most cited
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
December 2022
Luke Evuta Mumba (Professor) and Anor v The Council of the University of Zambia (CCZ 12 of 2022) [2022] ZMCC 46 (12 December 2022)
Whether gratuity under fixed‑term university contracts qualifies as a statutory pension benefit and requires payroll retention.
Constitutional law
— Pensions — Definition and requirement that pension benefits be granted by or under an Act of Parliament — Article 187 and Article 266
— Payroll retention — Application of Article 189(2) where a statutory pension benefit is unpaid — Retention on payroll pending payment
Employment law — Fixed‑term gratuity v statutory pension — Applicability of section 38(3)(b)(iii) of the Higher Education Act to public university employees
12 December 2022
Mukosa v Mulenga and Ors (CCZ/A 26 of 2021) [2022] ZMCC 48 (8 December 2022)
Election nullification requires candidate‑linked misconduct and widespread effect proved to a high degree of convincing clarity.
Electoral law — election petitions — standard of proof: 'fairly high degree of convincing clarity' required; section 97(2)(a) twofold threshold — misconduct by candidate or with knowledge/consent and widespread effect; partisan witnesses require corroboration; burden of proof on petitioner; appellate review of factual findings; absence of trial Judge’s handwritten notes does not necessarily render record incomplete.
8 December 2022
1
Current page, page 1
>