Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Constitutional Court of Zambia
Constitutional Court of Zambia - 2022 February
7 judgments
Advanced search
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Chibomba PC Mulenga JCC Munalula JCC Musaluke JCC Mulongoti JCC
Chibomba PC Mulenga JCC Musaluke JCC Chisunka JCC Mulongoti JCC
Sitali JCC Mulenga JCC Mulonda JCC Munalula JCC Chisunka JC
Sitali JCC Mulenga JCC Mulonda JCC Munalula JCC Mulongoti JCC
Sitali JCC Mulenga JCC Musaluke JCC Mulongoti JCC Chisunka JCC
Sitali JCC Mulonda JCC Munalula JCC Musaluke JCC
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Most cited
Filter
Results. 7 judgments found.
7 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
February 2022
Moyo v Attorney General (CCZ 6 of 2021) [2022] ZMCC 5 (28 February 2022)
Disciplinary discharge does not trigger Article 189(2) payroll retention; payment was a pension refund, not a pension benefit.
Constitutional law — Article 189(2) — retention on payroll until pension payment — pension benefit v. pension refund — disciplinary discharge not equivalent to retirement — Public Service Pensions Act No. 35 of 1996 supersedes earlier pensions regulations.
28 February 2022
Chapter One Foundation Ltd v Attorney General (CCZ 36 of 2021) [2022] ZMCC 4 (25 February 2022)
Presidential assent within Article 66 timeframes remains valid after Parliament's dissolution.
Constitutional law — presidential assent to Bills — post-dissolution assent — Article 66 timeframes — legislative vs executive functions — Article 81 dissolution — Article 66(6) deemed assent — comparative law (US, Australia).
25 February 2022
Malanji v Mulenga and Anor (CCZ/A 21 of 2021) [2022] ZMCC 6 (24 February 2022)
Whether an appellate court should admit fresh evidence under s25(1)(b) where documents were available before trial.
Constitutional Court Act s25(1)(b) — appellate power to order production of documents and call witnesses; Fresh evidence on appeal — exceptional admission; Ladd v Marshall test (non‑availability, materiality, credibility); Finality of litigation; White Book Order 59 r.10 guidance.
24 February 2022
Chanda v Lukonde (CCZ/A 4 of 2021) [2022] ZMCC 34 (15 February 2022)
An election may only be annulled where widespread malpractice by the candidate or agents is proved to a high degree of convincing clarity.
Electoral law — Election nullification — Section 97(2) Electoral Process Act — Burden of proof in election petitions (fairly high degree of convincing clarity) — Proof of malpractice by candidate or with candidate’s knowledge/consent — Credibility and corroboration of partisan witnesses — Tribunal’s misdirection and burden-shifting — Costs under section 109 EPA.
15 February 2022
Tembo v Phiri and Anor (CCZ/A 9 of 2021) [2022] ZMCC 44 (10 February 2022)
Tribunal properly exercised discretion on cross-examination; petitioner failed to meet burden to nullify the election.
Election law — procedure in election petitions — affidavit evidence and tribunal's power to order personal attendance and cross-examination — burden of proof in nullification under section 97(2) of the Electoral Process Act — corroboration and hearsay; credibility of suspect witnesses.
10 February 2022
Chapter One Foundation Ltd v Attorney General (CCZ 22 of 2021) [2022] ZMCC 1 (2 February 2022)
Article 263's requirement to declare assets on assuming or leaving office does not conflict with Article 261's code of conduct.
:[
2 February 2022
Nakasamu v Kokoma and Anor (CCZ/A 12 of 2021) [2022] ZMCC 43 (2 February 2022)
Appeal dismissed: petitioner failed to prove violence or that election form anomalies affected the result.
Electoral law — Election petitions — Burden and standard of proof — Alleged violence and intimidation — Requirement to prove candidate’s knowledge or consent — Anomalies on form GEN 20 — Section 97(4) EPA: substantial compliance and non-effect on results — Tribunal’s discretion to exclude unpleaded evidence.
2 February 2022
1
Current page, page 1
>