Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 1982 October
3 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
February
May
June
July
August
September
October
December
Browse by month
All months
February
May
June
July
August
September
October
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Gardner JJS
Muwo JJS
Ngulube DCJ
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Most cited
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
October 1982
Attorney-General v Musakanya (S.C.Z. Judgment 17 of 1981) [1982] ZMSC 20 (7 October 1982)
Absence of a specific date does not automatically make detention grounds vague; grounds must be given promptly and within fourteen days.
Constitutional law — detention — Article 27(1)(a): meaning of "as soon as is reasonably practicable" and mandatory fourteen-day limit; vagueness of grounds — test whether detainee can make meaningful representation; distinction between vagueness and alibi; duty to specify known dates
7 October 1982
Muvuma Kambanja Situna v the People (Appeal No.72 Of 1982; SCZ Judgment No.28 Of 1982) [1982] ZMSC 28 (5 October 1982)
Conviction unsafe where single frightened eyewitness identification and inadmissible police hearsay were relied upon.
Criminal law — Identification: single identifying witness — risk of honest mistake; necessity of searching questions and careful assessment of prevailing conditions
Evidence — Hearsay: statements to police not properly in evidence and not falling under s.4 or other exceptions are inadmissible to prove their truth. Trial judgment must demonstrate adequate consideration of defence evidence; failure is a misdirection rendering conviction unsafe
5 October 1982
In Re: The People (S.C.Z. Judgment 28 of 1982) [1982] ZMSC 19 (4 October 1982)
Convictions quashed where single eyewitness identification and hearsay police statements were unreliable and misdirected.
Criminal law — Identification — Single identifying witness — Need for cautious evaluation and searching questioning to exclude honest mistake; Hearsay — Statements to police and recounting by officers inadmissible unless falling within statutory/common-law exceptions (Evidence Act s.4); Trial judgment must show consideration of all relevant material
4 October 1982
1
Current page, page 1
>