|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 1980 |
|
|
Convictions based on unwarned statements and an unexplained post-mortem are unsafe; appeals allowed, convictions quashed.
Evidence — Statements to persons in authority — necessity of warn and caution; voluntariness — trial within a trial when challenged; admissibility under s.191A Criminal Procedure Code — medical officer should normally give oral evidence where report is inconclusive; medical evidence often essential to verdict and sentence; caution in drawing adverse inference from silence or emotional reaction.
|
31 December 1980 |
|
Pre‑Independence emergency declaration was deemed in force under the Independence Order; Presidential detention orders are prima facie valid.
Constitutional law — detention — continuity of pre-Independence emergency declaration via Independence Order s.7 — s.29 declarations — prima facie validity of Presidential detention orders — burden on detainee to prove invalidity — delay in supplying grounds raises presumption only after statutory period — lengthy interrogation not per se evidence of no grounds.
|
28 December 1980 |
|
Trial court must exercise discretion and hear accused before refusing withdrawal of guilty plea.
Criminal law – Plea retraction – Discretion to allow withdrawal of guilty plea before sentence – Must be exercised on good and sufficient grounds – Court should inquire into accused's reasons – Failure to exercise discretion is serious misdirection – Conviction quashed, retrial ordered.
|
18 December 1980 |
|
Failure to enter a verdict before ordering acquittal renders the trial a nullity and permits retrial.
Criminal procedure — Adjournment discretion; arraignment and plea under s.276; requirement that verdict be taken/entered before conviction or acquittal; failure to enter verdict renders trial a nullity.
|
17 December 1980 |
|
An accused is entitled to acquittal on a general-deficiency charge if his explanation might reasonably be true.
Criminal law – general deficiency in public funds – theft by public servant – adequacy of proof of conversion of specific sums – test for accused's explanatory account (explanation that might reasonably be true affords acquittal).
|
17 December 1980 |
|
Trial courts must decide all disputed matters; appellate courts disturb factual findings only if perverse or unsupported.
Civil procedure – duty of trial court to adjudicate all matters in dispute – Appeal – interference with trial findings of fact only if perverse, unsupported or based on misapprehension – Burden of proof in wrongful dismissal – Remittal for further findings.
|
15 December 1980 |
|
Whether the High Court may grant bail pending determination of an application for leave to appeal and when the Supreme Court may intervene.
Criminal procedure – Bail pending appeal – High Court jurisdiction under s.336 Criminal Procedure Code – Leave to appeal to Supreme Court – Single judge refusal and right to full court (s.4 Supreme Court Act) – Supreme Court’s jurisdiction under s.22 conditional on High Court refusal.
|
3 December 1980 |
|
Conviction for causing death by dangerous driving upheld; fine reduced because offender’s ability to pay must be considered.
Roads and Road Traffic — Negligence: sudden braking/turning without indication; failure to observe Highway Code as evidential of negligence. Dangerous driving: degree of care test; need not be reckless. Causation: accused’s driving need be more than de minimis cause even if deceased contributed. Sentence: fines with imprisonment in default must reflect ability to pay; fine and licence suspension are parts of total punishment.
|
3 December 1980 |
|
Belief induced by mental disorder is not reasonable; insanity under s.12 negates criminal responsibility, conviction set aside.
Criminal law — Murder — Insanity — Defence of mistaken belief (s.10) requires honest and reasonable belief; reasonableness incompatible with disordered mind — Intention (s.9) intact where grievous harm was intended — Not guilty by reason of insanity under s.12; detention during President's pleasure.
|
3 December 1980 |
| November 1980 |
|
|
Conviction upheld where multiple corroborated identifications and recovered stolen property negated honest mistake.
Criminal law — Identification evidence — Risk of honest mistake — Importance of testing witness credibility; Identification parade — Failure to hold one a serious dereliction in suitable cases; Recent possession — Can corroborate identification but cannot alone suffice unless guilt is the only reasonable inference.
|
5 November 1980 |
|
Carrying another’s firearm/ammunition and possession of a trophy require statutory exemption or lawful circumstance; forfeiture applies if connected to the offence.
Criminal law — possession of firearm or ammunition belonging to another — statutory exemption (s.11(4) Firearms Act) — scope and limitations; National Parks and Wildlife — unlawful possession of trophy — servant in charge of trophy; Statutory construction — legislative intent and context; Forfeiture — mandatory on conviction (s.145(1)).
|
5 November 1980 |
| October 1980 |
|
|
An equivocal admission ("I stole") is insufficient for a theft conviction; retrial ordered on appropriate charge.
Criminal law — Plea — Unequivocal plea required; "I stole" insufficient for theft conviction; appropriate charge may be taking and driving away under s.229 Roads and Road Traffic Act; equivocal plea renders proceedings a nullity.
|
20 October 1980 |
|
Failure to resolve voluntariness of a contested confession rendered the trial a mistrial and required a retrial.
Criminal procedure – Confessions – Voluntariness of warn-and-caution statements – Trial within a trial – Discontinuance of trial within a trial – Credibility of investigating officer – Mis‑trial and retrial.
|
20 October 1980 |
|
The High Court may not dismiss the applicant's appeal for want of prosecution; section 325 requires a reasoned disposal in absence.
Criminal procedure – Appeal – Absence of appellant at hearing – Section 325 Criminal Procedure Code permits summary disposal in absence but requires examination of record and reasoned judgment – High Court may not dismiss appeal for want of prosecution – Service of notice and inquiry required.
|
7 October 1980 |
|
Absence of appellant does not justify dismissal for want of prosecution; appeals must be decided under s.325 after proper service inquiry.
Criminal procedure — Appeal — Absence of appellant at hearing — Section 325 Criminal Procedure Code — Summary disposal of appeals in absence — No power to dismiss High Court appeals for want of prosecution — Service of notice.
|
6 October 1980 |
| August 1980 |
|
|
Custodial sentence upheld for first offender convicted of unlawful firearm possession due to seriousness and need for deterrence.
Criminal law – Unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition – Custodial sentence for first offender – Legislative option of fine – Firearm offences treated as exceptional; deterrent sentencing – Siyauya v The People applied.
|
18 August 1980 |
|
Child witness evidence requires corroboration and courts must acquit where the prosecution case is insufficient at close.
Evidence – Child witnesses require corroboration; Criminal procedure – No case to answer: mandatory acquittal at close of prosecution; evidence led after close cannot cure deficient prosecution case.
|
18 August 1980 |
|
|
18 August 1980 |
| July 1980 |
|
|
Previous convictions alone do not justify exceeding a statutory minimum; sentence reduced to the mandatory minimum.
Sentence – Statutory minimum for repeat offence – Previous convictions trigger minimum but do not by themselves justify exceeding it – Court must assess intrinsic seriousness of offence and give reasons for imposing sentence above minimum.
|
15 July 1980 |
|
Omission to perform a scientific test does not vitiate conviction if cumulative non-technical evidence sufficiently establishes identity.
Evidence – Police omission to carry out scientific test on tampered chassis number – Dereliction of duty and rebuttable presumption; Identification of vehicle by cumulative non-technical features; Admissibility of testimony by experienced non-expert motor-dealer; Sufficiency of evidence notwithstanding absence of specialised testing.
|
14 July 1980 |
|
An inadequate trial-within-trial ruling requires exclusion of confessions and may invalidate convictions unsupported by other evidence.
Evidence – Trial within a trial – adequacy of ruling on voluntariness of confessions; voluntariness and admissibility of statements; exclusion of tainted evidence; recent possession and identification; police duty to test for fingerprints.
|
14 July 1980 |
|
Recent possession of stolen goods does not automatically prove store-breaking; court may substitute conviction for receiving stolen property.
Criminal law — Sufficiency of inference from possession of stolen goods — Recent possession does not inevitably prove guilt of earlier breaking and entering; Judiciary must consider accused's account. | Criminal Procedure Code s.188 — Substitution of conviction — Court may convict under s.318 (receiving) when accused charged under composite s.303 and stealing was specifically pleaded. | Penal Code s.303 (breaking and entering and stealing) — composite charge contains theft element. | Penal Code s.318(1) — receiving stolen property.
|
14 July 1980 |
| June 1980 |
|
|
Whether incorporated contract amendments obligated the main contractor to bear subcontractor accommodation rental costs.
Contract construction – give effect to all words, avoid treating terms as surplusage; incorporation of tender documents; meaning of "provide" and "bear" as shifting liability for site facilities and rental charges; subcontractor accommodation – liability for rent; award of interest and costs.
|
18 June 1980 |
|
Charges under section 319 must be precisely drafted using the Criminal Procedure Code form to ensure accused persons understand the case against them.
Criminal law and procedure – Drafting of charges – Necessity of clear, precise wording – Section 319 Penal Code – Use of first schedule format and recommended wording: "Failing to account for possession of property suspected to have been stolen or unlawfully obtained."
|
8 June 1980 |
| May 1980 |
|
|
Conviction under s.318(2) improper where facts establish a felony; insufficient evidence linking the appellant warranted quashing.
Criminal law — Receiving/retaining stolen property — Penal Code s.318(1) and (2) — Distinction between felonious and misdemeanour acquisition — 'Knowing or having reason to believe' requires proof property was obtained by a crime — Evidential sufficiency and benefit of doubt.
|
13 May 1980 |
|
Conviction under s.318(2) was incompetent where evidence established a felony and no reliable link to retaining the property.
Criminal law – Receiving/retaining stolen property – Penal Code s.318(1) (felony) v s.318(2) (misdemeanour) – knowledge or reason to believe – objective character of underlying acquisition – sufficiency of evidence.
|
13 May 1980 |
|
Whether a false-pretences charge can be converted to theft under s.188(2) CPC when owners did not intend to part with money.
Criminal law — Obtaining by false pretences v. theft — Evidence of intention to part with ownership — s.188(2) Criminal Procedure Code: substitution of theft conviction — s.265 Penal Code — sentencing.
|
5 May 1980 |
|
Defective voir dire and failure to consider child’s interest or corroboration led to quashing of the conviction.
Evidence — Child witness of tender years — Voir dire and competence — Requirement to establish understanding of oath — Need to consider possible interest and corroboration — Misdirection by treating cross‑examination as supporting evidence — Juveniles Act s.122.
|
5 May 1980 |
| April 1980 |
|
|
Appellate court re-evaluated handwriting and corroboration; conviction quashed as evidence and trial procedure were unsafe.
Evidence — Handwriting comparison; appellate review of inferences from undisputed documents — corroboration of accomplice evidence — refusal of adjournment to examine documents — unfair trial and unsafe conviction.
|
21 April 1980 |
|
Premeditated killing cannot be reduced to manslaughter for provocation; severe sentence required despite hardship.
Criminal law – Plea to lesser offence – Impropriety where facts disclose a major offence; Provocation/heat of passion – unavailable where conduct is premeditated; Sentencing – hardship and ill health insufficient to outweigh deterrence and severity of premeditated killing.
|
7 April 1980 |
|
Failure to lift fingerprints is not dereliction where possession is clear; excessive 30-year sentences for first offenders reduced to 15 years.
Criminal law — Identification and recent possession — Failure to lift fingerprints — No dereliction where possession is clear; inferences from recent possession; sentencing—first offenders, excessive sentence reduced.
|
7 April 1980 |
| March 1980 |
|
|
Cogent circumstantial evidence can sustain a murder conviction despite excluded confessions and inconclusive medical cause of death.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Admissibility of confessions – Exercise of judicial discretion where alleged police mistreatment – Proof of cause of death without conclusive medical evidence – Opportunity, motive and identification.
|
24 March 1980 |
|
Sworn testimony of a child under 16 is suspect and requires corroboration; uncorroborated evidence led to quashing the conviction.
Evidence — Children — Sworn evidence of a child (under 16) is inherently suspect and ordinarily requires corroboration or "something more"; competency after voire dire does not eliminate need for warning or corroboration; misdirection in treating non‑corroborative material as corroboration renders conviction unsafe; identification and exclusion of defence witnesses are additional potential misdirections.
|
17 March 1980 |
|
Forfeiture orders under the Customs Act are void without offering the claimed owner a hearing; bona fide purchasers may acquire title.
Criminal procedure — Review under s.338 CPR — Joinder and receipt of affidavit evidence; Customs law — Forfeiture under s.169(2) — Owner’s right to be heard; Property — Purchaser’s title to smuggled goods; Remedies — remit for factual inquiry.
|
17 March 1980 |
|
Accidental firearm discharge without hostile intent or recklessness is not manslaughter; conviction set aside.
Criminal law – Manslaughter – Unlawful act must amount to at least a technical assault – Hostile intent and recklessness required for conviction – Accidental firearm discharge where defendant believed weapon unloaded – R v Lamb applied.
|
10 March 1980 |
| February 1980 |
|
|
Court upheld conviction on single credible police witness; discovery from unrecorded or involuntary statements admissible.
Evidence — single witness sufficient where credible; calling additional witnesses required only if doubt arises — Evidence discovered after involuntary confession or unrecorded statement admissible — Failure to take fingerprints or photographs not automatically dereliction of duty — Admissibility and weight distinct issues.
|
4 February 1980 |
| January 1980 |
|
|
Whether a mistaken but allegedly defensive belief justifies deadly force depends on whether that belief and the response were objectively reasonable.
Criminal law – self-defence and defence of property – mistaken belief must be honest and reasonable – distinction between immediate assault and distant outbuilding disturbance – excessive force; manslaughter upheld; sentence reduced.
|
23 January 1980 |
|
Private consultations between magistrate and prosecution/witness in accused's absence made the conviction unsafe.
Criminal procedure – Trial fairness – Magistrate holding private consultations with State Advocate and prosecution witness in absence of accused – Impropriety – Justice must be seen to be done – Conviction quashed.
|
22 January 1980 |
|
A sentencing court must sentence for the convicted offence and must not speculate about unproven, more serious offences.
Sentence — sentencing court must impose sentence for the offence of conviction; improper to speculate about unproven, more serious offences. Criminal law — receiving stolen property (motor vehicle) is more serious than ordinary theft; substantial custodial sentences appropriate. Appeal — appellate court may set aside and substitute sentence where trial court erred in principle.
|
21 January 1980 |