Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 1985 July
3 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
September
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
September
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
July 1985
Miyanda v Attorney-General (S.C.Z. Judgment 21 of 1985) [1985] ZMSC 19 (30 July 1985)
Attestation as cadet can vest accrued statutory protection against summary dismissal; damages (with interest) awarded, not reinstatement.
Employment law — accrued rights under a repealed statute — attestation as cadet vests contingent contractual/statutory protections — procedural safeguards before dismissal survive where conditions for acquisition were set in motion — discretionary relief: declaration v damages — assessment of damages and interest
30 July 1985
Wise v EF Hervey Limited (S.C.Z. Judgment 18 of 1985) [1985] ZMSC 18 (14 July 1985)
A counter-claim consisting only of a schedule of values without material facts does not disclose a cause of action and must be struck off.
Civil procedure — Pleadings — Cause of action — Necessity to plead material facts — Bare schedules of damages insufficient — When statutory, equitable or contractual bases are relied on, material facts must be alleged
14 July 1985
Appollo Refrigeration Services Co Ltd v Farmers House Ltd (S.C.Z. Judgment 19 of 1985) [1985] ZMSC 17 (4 July 1985)
Landlord’s possession claim must be begun by writ; new landlord may rely on prior landlord’s notice to quit; amendment allowed, three‑month stay.
Procedure — Landlord and tenant claims for possession of business premises must be commenced by writ (Order 6 High Court Rules); originating notice of motion inappropriate under Landlord and Tenant (Business Premises) Act. New landlord may rely on notice to quit served by previous landlord where intentions (e.g. redevelopment) are similar. Amendment to cure procedural defect permissible where no prejudice arises. Stay of execution granted
4 July 1985
1
Current page, page 1
>