Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 1989 December
3 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Gardner AJS
Ngulube DCJ
Silungwe CJ
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
December 1989
Dimuna v People (S.C.Z. Judgment 23 of 1989) [1989] ZMSC 1 (31 December 1989)
Court upheld conviction: no dereliction for untested fingerprints without proof of opportunity, and no legal rule requiring corroboration of a single police witness.
Evidence — identification by witnesses; fingerprints — dereliction of duty only if opportunity to obtain usable prints is shown; corroboration — no rule requiring corroboration of single police witness; comment on accused's silence — permissible factual observation; juvenile status and mandatory death sentence
31 December 1989
Zimco Properties Limited v Dinalar Randee Enterprise (S.C.Z. Judgment 1 of 1989) [1989] ZMSC 2 (31 December 1989)
Section 11(1)(e) applies only to superior landlords who must prove better rental yield; five-year rule bars transfers defeating new-tenancy rights.
Landlord and Tenant (Business Premises) Act (Cap. 440) — s.11(1)(e) — interpretation; applies to superior landlords — must prove superior tenancy, ownership on termination, and that letting as a whole gives better rental yield; s.11(2) five‑year protection — transfers to evade tenant rights; notice to quit binds landlord to stated grounds
31 December 1989
Dennys Mushiko Luywa v Cold Storage Board of Zambia (Appeal No. 30/89) [1989] ZMSC 148 (12 December 1989)
Appeal dismissed: Board had power to dismiss and procedural defects did not cause prejudicial breach of natural justice.
Administrative law — natural justice — adequacy of notice and opportunity to be heard; statutory power of board to dismiss employees; procedural irregularity and prejudice; discretionary remedies.
12 December 1989
1
Current page, page 1
>