Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 2000 April
4 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 4 judgments found.
4 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
April 2000
Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines Ltd v Sinkala and Ors (SCZ Appeal 149 of 1998) [2000] ZMSC 132 (18 April 2000)
Post‑ruling material cannot be 'fresh evidence' for review; reopening a decision on after‑the‑fact documents was impermissible.
Civil procedure — Review under Order 39 r.1 — 'Fresh evidence' must have existed at time of original ruling and been unknowable with due diligence — Evidence created after a ruling cannot ground review; extension of protection order cannot be treated as review application without fresh evidence.
18 April 2000
Attorney General v Parbhoo (SCZ Appeal 44 of 1996) [2000] ZMSC 107 (6 April 2000)
Court upheld liability but reduced damages: replacement value at date of accident and loss-of-use limited for mitigation.
Civil liability — motor vehicle accident — State vicarious liability — adjournment and judicial discretion — natural justice — sufficiency of evidence (police report and driver testimony) — damages for total loss of chattel: market value at date of accident — mitigation and limitation of loss-of-use awards — interest and costs.
6 April 2000
Air France v Mwase Import & Export Company Limited (SCZ 10 of 2000) [2000] ZMSC 45 (5 April 2000)
Airway bill terms govern international air carriage; consignor must record delivery deadlines—carrier not liable for unrecorded urgency.
Air law — airway bill as contract and evidence — consignor’s duty to specify delivery time on airway bill — Warsaw Convention (Carriage by Air Act) limits on liability — FIRAV (first available flight) bookings — res ipsa loquitur in air carriage claims — agency of forwarding agents
5 April 2000
Sambo & Another v Mwanza (SCZ 16 of 2000) [2000] ZMSC 17 (5 April 2000)
Court upheld cancellation of a fraudulently procured certificate of title and awarded mesne profits and costs to the occupier.
Land law — Certificate of title — Fraudulently procured — Occupier’s priority — Registrar and municipal duty to investigate title — Mesne profits — Costs follow the event
5 April 2000
1
Current page, page 1
>