Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 2011 February
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Chibomba JS
Sakala CJ
Silomba JS
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
February 2011
Informatics Limited v Stanbic Bank (2 of 2011) [2011] ZMSC 2 (22 February 2011)
Bank improperly ordered foreclosure without pleading; guarantors liable only to amount of their guarantees; no bank negligence found.
Banking law — overdraft against uncleared instruments — Bills of Exchange Act s.45 (presentation within reasonable time) — holder for value — liability of guarantors; foreclosure not to be ordered without relief prayed for
22 February 2011
Premesh Bhai Megan Patel v Rephidim Institute Limited (Appeal No. 53/2005; SCZ JUDGMENT NO. 3 OF 2011) [2011] ZMSC 40 (22 February 2011)
Default judgment upheld: no disclosed defence and omitted terms cannot be implied or raised on appeal without prior pleadings.
Civil procedure — setting aside default judgment; defence on the merits; parol evidence rule and admissibility of extrinsic evidence to add omitted terms; implication of terms; Lands and Deeds Registry Act—non-registration and waiver of fresh issues on appeal.
22 February 2011
1
Current page, page 1
>