|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 1936 |
|
|
Proof that a judgment debtor had means to pay part of the debt can justify committal, suspended on instalment payments.
Debtors Act 1869 s.5 – Judgment summons – Committal for non‑payment – Proof of means to pay part of debt suffices – Committal may be suspended on instalment terms; ex parte Fryer applied; Debtors Ordinance (Cap.14) s.4 equivalent to s.5.
|
31 December 1936 |
|
Survivor under a joint will takes an absolute estate; a subsequent gift-over as condition subsequent cannot curtail it.
Wills — Joint will — Validity under English law; construction of operative clause as absolute gift; proviso as condition subsequent; gift over inconsistent and unenforceable.
|
31 December 1936 |
|
A deportation recommendation under Penal Code s.34 requires an outline of the prosecution case or principal witness evidence even after a guilty plea.
Criminal procedure — Conviction on guilty plea — Recommendation for deportation under Penal Code s.34 — Necessity for prosecution outline or principal witness evidence in the record before deportation may be recommended.
|
31 December 1936 |
|
An accused should not be called to make a defence where the prosecution has no case; excessive disciplinary sentences under the District Messengers Ordinance will be reduced.
Criminal procedure – insufficiency of prosecution evidence – accused improperly called to make defence – admissions in defence cannot cure no-case-to-answer; Review powers – quashing convictions where irregularity prejudiced fairness; District Messengers Ordinance – misuse for departmental discipline; Sentencing – reduction of excessive fines and avoidance of corporal punishment.
|
31 December 1936 |
|
High Court may substitute a section of conviction and reduce sentence on review where evidence supports s214 but not s208.
Criminal procedure – review power to alter conviction and reduce sentence (Criminal Procedure Code ss.300, 309); Penal Code – unlawful act causing harm (s.214) distinguished from wounding (s.208); Plea recording requirements (Criminal Procedure Code s.187(2)); Sentencing – mitigation and reduction; Conduct: setting traps on public path.
|
31 December 1936 |
|
An excessive ten-year sentence for housebreaking was reduced to two years, clarifying three key sentencing principles.
Sentencing — unlawful excess — ten-year sentence for housebreaking exceeding seven-year statutory maximum — sentencing principles: intrinsic gravity, antecedents, prevalence — reduction to two years with hard labour.
|
31 December 1936 |
|
A subsequent confession is inadmissible unless it is shown the inducement behind an earlier inadmissible confession was effectively dispelled.
Criminal law – Confession – Admissibility of subsequent confession after prior improperly induced confession – Voluntariness required – Lapse of time less dispositive for unsophisticated natives – Statutory caution alone may be insufficient; need for explicit dispelling of prior inducement.
|
31 December 1936 |
|
Conditional discharge must be properly ordered; later sentencing without proof of recognisance breach is invalid.
Criminal procedure – Conditional discharge/recognisance under C.P.C. s.287(1) and Penal Code s.31 – Form and conditions of recognisance (good behaviour, limitation of residence, security) – Functus officio principle – Invalidity of subsequent sentencing absent proof of breach.
|
31 December 1936 |