Supreme Court of Zambia - 1996 May

14 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 14 judgments found.

14 judgments
May 1996
Appellant failed to prove dismissal was discrimination based on social status; evidence supported dismissal for facilitating fraudulent traveller's cheques.
  • Employment law — unfair dismissal — discrimination based on social status — burden of proof on complainant — comparators and causal link — procedural fairness — dismissal for facilitating issuance of travellers cheques without required approval.
31 May 1996
31 May 1996
Bank liable for converting sale proceeds after agreeing to retain dollars; prior Bank of Zambia approval was not legally required.
22 May 1996
The slip rule corrects clerical errors only and cannot be used to reopen or set aside a final judgment.
  • Practice — Correction of judgments — Slip rule (order 20 / rule 78) — Clerical errors only — Not a vehicle to review or set aside final judgments — Finality of appeals — Remedy for fraud by action to set aside.
22 May 1996
Court reduces respondents' discrimination compensation to twelve months' salary and fixes deemed retirement as 2 December 1991.
  • Employment law — Discrimination on political grounds — Early retirement deemed date — Quantum of damages for wrongful discrimination — Interest at average bank deposit rate — Damages non-taxable — No deduction of salary in lieu of notice.
22 May 1996
Evidence did not establish malice aforethought; murder conviction substituted for manslaughter with a six-year sentence.
  • Criminal law — Murder v. manslaughter — Requirement of malice aforethought — Substitution of conviction — Sentence reduction to imprisonment for manslaughter.
21 May 1996
A court may stay execution of a tax warrant pending resolution where judicial protection against injury is necessary.
  • Tax law — Warrant of distress under Income Tax Act — Assessed tax payable despite objection — Court's inherent jurisdiction/judicial review — Stay of execution pending determination where objection undecided.
14 May 1996
14 May 1996
Appeal dismissed: conviction upheld where accused was seen selling stolen property and his explanation was rejected.
  • Criminal law — Aggravated robbery; corroboration of accomplice/escapee evidence; possession and sale of stolen property as admissible circumstantial proof; recovery and discovery supporting conviction.
7 May 1996
Murder conviction upheld; death sentence commuted to 15 years' imprisonment due to mutual affray and appellant's youth.
  • Criminal law — Murder — self-defence; voluntary mutual combat; provocation and drunkenness as defences; sentencing — extenuating circumstances warranting commutation of death sentence to fixed term imprisonment.
7 May 1996
Appellant’s conviction for murder upheld; sentence reduced to 10 years due to extenuating drunken circumstances.
  • Evidence — Credibility assessment; distinction between adverse finding on credit and resolving conflicting versions; self-defence; sentencing — extenuating circumstances (drunkenness) reducing moral culpability
7 May 1996
Convictions quashed for lack of sufficient evidence linking appellant to drugs; analyst report held admissible.
  • Narcotic Drugs Act — trafficking v. possession — charging both offences; evidential sufficiency and safe conviction; admissibility of analyst report under s.192(1) C.P.C.; vehicle forfeiture.
7 May 1996
Conviction upheld where appellant was found selling stolen property and his explanation was rejected.
  • Criminal law — aggravated robbery — accused found selling stolen property — accomplice/escapee information as lead — corroboration not required where possession, eyewitness evidence and recovery of property support conviction.
7 May 1996
The court upheld the trial credibility finding against the applicant and reduced sentence due to intoxication as extenuation.
  • Evidence — witness credibility — distinction between adverse finding on credit and resolving conflicting versions; Criminal law — murder — causation in melee; Self-defence — not established where accused’s account disbelieved; Sentencing — intoxication and drunken circumstances as extenuating factors
6 May 1996