Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 1996 July
2 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
Results. 2 judgments found.
2 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
July 1996
Mate & Others v People (S.C.Z. Judgment 11 of 1996) [1996] ZMSC 14 (8 July 1996)
Whether alleged involuntary police statements (including forced signatures) require a trial-within-a-trial and if convictions can still stand.
Criminal procedure — Statements by accused — Voluntariness — Trial-within-a-trial required where voluntariness or forced signature is alleged — Allegation of no statement raises credibility — Proviso applied to uphold convictions
8 July 1996
Sentor Motors Limited and 3 Other Companies (S.C.Z. Judgment 9 of 1996) [1996] ZMSC 12 (4 July 1996)
A judge may not convert an interim consent order into a final judgment and thereby deny parties a substantive adjudication.
Court duty to adjudicate — Interim consent order — Conversion of interim arrangements into final judgment — Denial of justice — High Court Act s.9(2), s.13 — Right to fair hearing within reasonable time (Constitution)
4 July 1996
1
Current page, page 1
>