Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Publications
Newsletters
Speeches
Law Reform Reports
Paralegal Resources
Gazettes
Bills
About
Help
Home
Judgments
Supreme Court of Zambia
Supreme Court of Zambia - 2002 December
3 judgments
Advanced search
Court registries
Skip past Court registries
Supreme Court Registry Lusaka
Years
Skip past years
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Browse by year
All years
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1964
1941
Months
Skip past months
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Browse by month
All months
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Filters
Skip to results
Filters
Judges
Skip to next filter group
Chitengi J
Alphabet
Skip to next filter group
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Filter documents by title
Sort documents by
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Most cited
Filter
Results. 3 judgments found.
3 judgments
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
December 2002
Chibote Meat Processing Corporation Ltd (Formerly known as CC Farms Limited) and Ors v Sasol Fertilizers Zambia Limited (SCZ/8/243/2002) [2002] ZMSC 169 (20 December 2002)
A single Supreme Court judge lacks jurisdiction to grant interlocutory injunctions; appeal lies to the full Court.
Civil procedure — interlocutory injunction — appeal against refusal — jurisdiction of single Judge versus full Court — stay of execution — procedural irregularity.
20 December 2002
Jack Chanda and Anor v People (SCZ 29 of 2002) [2002] ZMSC 101 (3 December 2002)
Murder conviction upheld without post‑mortem; death sentence reduced to 20 years due to failure to consider drinking as mitigating evidence.
Criminal law — Murder — Sufficiency of evidence without post‑mortem where assault and subsequent death are cogently linked; Malice aforethought — intention to cause grievous harm/death established by brutal assault; Sentencing — extenuating circumstances under s.201(1)(b) Penal Code (youth not automatically mitigating; drinking may be considered); Sentence substitution from death to 20 years' imprisonment.
3 December 2002
Chanda & Another v People (SCZ 29 of 2002) [2002] ZMSC 79 (2 December 2002)
Absence of post‑mortem not fatal; malice proved; drinking was extenuating—death sentence reduced to 20 years.
Evidence — absence of post‑mortem not fatal where non‑medical evidence cogent; Murder — malice aforethought established by brutal assault; Sentence — youthful age not per se extenuating; drinking, provocation or witchcraft accusation may be extenuating circumstances
2 December 2002
1
Current page, page 1
>