High Court of Zambia - 2013 August

8 judgments
Skip past Court registries
Skip past years
Skip past months
Skip to results

Results. 8 judgments found.

8 judgments
August 2013
Prior threats and cumulative circumstantial evidence sufficed to convict the accused of murder by arson.
  • Criminal law — Murder by arson: malice aforethought established by setting combustible dwelling alight; circumstantial evidence (threats, voice identification, presence, footprints, inconsistent statements) sufficient to convict; victim's re‑entry immaterial
28 August 2013
Conviction for murder where prosecution proved identity, causation and intent; provocation defence unavailable to divorced spouse.
  • Criminal law — Murder: elements (death, unlawful act, causation, identity, malice aforethought) — identification evidence at night — alibi — provocation defence unavailable to divorced spouse
26 August 2013
A party seeking joinder in judicial review must comply with Order 53 RSC and show concrete sufficient interest.
  • Judicial Review
    • — Procedure for Joinder — Order 53 RSC governs joinder under s.10 High Court Act
    • — Joinder — Sufficient Interest (Locus Standi) — Concrete legal interest required, not abstract inconvenience
22 August 2013
Fatal head injuries established unlawful assault, but provocation reduced murder to manslaughter.
  • Criminal law — Homicide: medical evidence disproving drowning; last-seen and admissions corroborated by recovery of clothing — Provocation as defence reducing murder to manslaughter
21 August 2013
Claim against lessor for leased-truck repairs dismissed: no collateral contract, no agency, compound interest disallowed.
  • Contract law — privity of contract; collateral contract exception; agency — authority to bind principal; lease obligations for repairs; compound interest requires express agreement or acquiescence; sale of leased chattel requires lessor consent
21 August 2013
14 August 2013
Judicial review dismissed as out of time, based on repealed law, and because a statutory appeal was not pursued.
  • Administrative Law
    • — Judicial Review — Time limits and promptness (Order 53) — Application must be made promptly and within three months
    • — Alternative remedy — Statutory right of appeal to the Minister ordinarily bars judicial review where not pursued
    • — Repealed statute — Proceedings cannot be sustained under repealed legislation
11 August 2013
High Court action to enforce a Small Claims Court judgment was dismissed for failure to exhaust Small Claims Court enforcement procedures.
  • Civil procedure — Small Claims Courts Act (ss.21, 24) — enforcement of Small Claims Court judgments — proper forum for enforcement — attempted piercing of corporate veil — failure to exhaust statutory remedies
7 August 2013